Was Pacquiao the Real Fighter of the Decade?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by kadyo, Nov 29, 2010.


  1. kadyo

    kadyo Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,771
    2
    May 12, 2007
    I'm giving you an exception for that emotional speech but no more lengthy talk next time. Just vote, no opinion needed. :yep
     
  2. HoldMyBeer

    HoldMyBeer Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,346
    6
    Feb 14, 2010
    haha!
    gotta give respect where respect is due though :good
     
  3. Chappy112

    Chappy112 Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,347
    10
    Nov 14, 2009
    B-Hop.

    Wouldn't argue with people saying Pacquiao though.
     
  4. kadyo

    kadyo Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,771
    2
    May 12, 2007
    :good
     
  5. Anima

    Anima Kinetic Link Full Member

    6,205
    438
    Nov 12, 2010
    keyword is FIGHTER, thus why I chose Pac.
     
  6. Rexrapper 1

    Rexrapper 1 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,594
    722
    Aug 23, 2010
    I have no argument against Pacquiao as Fighter of the Decade. But if u asked me personally i would have given it to Bernard Hopkins. 20 title defenses and the undisputed middleweight champ. Pacquiao has never been champion for that long. Floyd Mayweather Jr also has an argument. He was champion for the whole decade and top 10 p4p during the decade. So for people saying Bernard and Floyd have no argument is asinine to me. Also I am not a ***** or *******. I just call it like I see it. Either 3 could have been Fighter of the Decade.
     
  7. kadyo

    kadyo Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,771
    2
    May 12, 2007
    128-32, seems like yes is pulling away.
     
  8. kadyo

    kadyo Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,771
    2
    May 12, 2007
    EDIT: double post
     
  9. HoldMyBeer

    HoldMyBeer Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,346
    6
    Feb 14, 2010
    hopkins was a top class operator, but being a champion in any weight division for any length of time loses it's appeal compared to a fighter like pacquiao who jumped weights to fight bigger men and fought a better class of opponent because of it.

    jones was the same - great fighter who ruled his division with ease, but what pacman has done easily eclipses them.

    that's not to say that he was better than them, that's another story...

    EDIT : meaning hopkins and jones ruled poor divisions...
     
  10. kadyo

    kadyo Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,771
    2
    May 12, 2007
    It suddenly jumped to 142-32.
     
  11. p4p_kid

    p4p_kid Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,022
    1
    Dec 8, 2008
    it's about quality of oppositions.

    can you imagine mayweather against cotto,clottey or margo? hmmmmm
     
  12. kadyo

    kadyo Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,771
    2
    May 12, 2007
    maybe most *******s are online this time of the day. :yep
     
  13. MrWonderful

    MrWonderful Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,466
    0
    Feb 2, 2010

    Manny's the fighter of the decade for the same reason many consider Tyson the fighter of the 1980s

    An exciting hurricaine that took the sport for a few years.

    I don't think anyone actually thinks Pacquiao or Tyson were the best boxers of their era

    The best boxer is the person least likely to get beaten. Pacquiao's had losses, draws and near missed numerous times in the last 10 years
     
  14. MrWonderful

    MrWonderful Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,466
    0
    Feb 2, 2010

    You mean the Clottey that lost to Baldomir, and the Margarito who got whipped by Mosely.

    They're only good opposition for Pacquiao, and not for Mayweather, as they have a chance of beating Pacquiao
     
  15. MrWonderful

    MrWonderful Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,466
    0
    Feb 2, 2010

    *******s love polls.

    As 90% of Pacquiao fans don't have jobs, are under 16, and spend all day trolling web sites.