Was Pacquiao v Marquez III a cherry pick gone wrong?

Marquez didnt win because of steroids.

Who was the stupid fighter who came wading in, with his chin hanging out?

Thats not steroids, thats poor boxing IQ.

 

this is the most dumbest **** I have ever read thankfully I only read the title.troll thread for sure but whatever. marquez is a great a hall of fame fighter he is no cherry pick for anybody the fact that pacquiao beat marquez not once but twice and kept on giving marquez chance after chance proves pacquiao's greatness and the fact that pacquiao is a great warrior.good

 

Anyone who thought Marquez vs Manny 3 was a cherry pick or described it to be a cherry pick really DKSAB !

 

That's also a different fight.

 

It's funny how *******s quickly change the tune. Before jmm vs pac 3, they were claiming jmm was going to get knocked out and it was career suicide. Saying how it was just a stay busy fight for pac. Claiming jmm was old, slow, fighting bums, was not on mannys level. Also the famous "pac is now a full welterweight, he beat odlh, cotto etc, who has jmm beat". Even after the 3rd they still defended the robbery and pretended to agree with the horrible decision.

Then ktfo6 and the whole tune changes. For those who claim pac always gave him a rematch, no he didn't he waited out jmm 4 years between 1, 2 & 3. Pac didn't just "give" him the remach, he earned them by arguably beating pac in all their fights. Ktfo6 is not a controversial win, it's clear cut meaning the war is over.

 

I was referring to the 4th fight, see the post i was replying to.

Thats the fight were butthurt *******s claim JMM was on peds

 

Marquez was not a cherry pick, and there's no such thing as a cherry pick gone wrong. People came up with that to discredit a fighter when they said it was a cherry pick but turned out to be a tough fight, but they have to stick to their guns. So they say "Well, it was a cherry pick gone wrong". When in reality, they didn't know what the **** they're talking about to begin with.

I feel like I'm in a Dave Chappelle skit.

 

It was a cherry pick gone wrong according to ******s.

 

No, people THOUGHT Herrera was a cherry pick because he's a small name. He beat Provodnikov too, probably better than Algieri did. So what is Algieri to Pacquiao? A cherry pick or no?

 

But Rigo is already recognized as an elite fighter. People thought Donaire, who was P4P at the time, would beat him but Rigo showed us he's elite. Like I said; Herrera beat Provo just like Algieri. So if Herrera is a cherry pick for Danny, is Algieri not a cherry pick for Pac?

 

Herrera did beat Danny, he'd beat Provo now too. How does Algieri belong in the same ring as Pacquiao though? Not bashing Pacquiao, but Algieri shouldn't even be at this stage yet. He has 20 fights, only one 12 round fight, and about 2 fights prior it was an 8 round match. He's fought scrubs. Provo isn't even elite, he's good but he's already been outboxed by Herrera and Bradley. Everyone already knows Provo is a one trick pony that relies on his power and can be outboxed. Algieri's lucky he had that size advantage and he's going to need against Pacquiao. Don't get me wrong, Algieri's a good fighter but this is a cherry pick for Pacquiao. And it's funny how you bring Floyd up when we weren't even talking about him. That's what you need to resort to since you have nothing to add? Go start another thread or get your Pac-blinders off for a second.

No Marquez fight was a cherry pick for Pac, despite him being 38 or whatever in 2012. Bradley was not a cherry pick at any point. But Rios and Algieri are cherry picked fights. Face it, Floyd and Pac cherry pick fights.