Was pacquiao vs marquez 3 a robbery?

http://boxrec.com/media/index.php/Manny_Pacquiao_vs._Juan_Manuel_Marquez_(3rd_meeting)

Compare Bradley. One scored 50-50 ringside, other 121-1. Hope you see the difference

 

yea, your not a ******* atsch

 

It was a robbery, manny had the look of defeat all over him after the fight. People love manny and mexicans also but that night everyone was chunking trash at him because they knew it was b.s. Aside from the ktfo6, jmm vs pac 3 was the easiest fight to score out of the first 3. Im a jmm fan and can admit Timmy schooled jmm, I dont know why *******s can not admit defeat, they see pac as god or something.

 

I believe it was a blatant robbery....and I was rooting for Pacquiao by the way.

 

Actually about 2/3 of people polled scored it for JMM. It was at best a draw for Manny. Still I think the term robbery is used too loosely these days and doesn't apply here.

 

indeed robbery. fight wasnt close .... Marquez to pac to school

 

Actually only about 40% of the ringside wxperts had jmm winning. See link above

 

Major robbery. Marquez should officially be 2-1-1 against Pacquiao, as he already is in most people's minds.

 

People do realize that most of the "ringside experts" trotted out in response to decisions like this were not actually ringside, right? Nor are they experts on scoring, but that's another matter entirely.

 

Really bad decision. Most hardcore fans had JMM winning. I had it 8-4 JMM. It was a horrible decision, pissed me off.

 

It was a closely contested fight, but with proper scoring the decision should have gone to Marquez.

 

It was a little closer than Pac/Bradley but no where within the margin of error where you could scorer it for Pacquioa. Clear JMM win.

 

thing was, people/fans expected more from pacquiao and less from the undetectable drug ingesting marquez.

so when the opposite happened, people that scored on emotion voted for juan even though pac won the round.