Yeah whose that? Brittle hands Mayweather who only came back to the sport because he needs money. Please bring on any fighter, I'll gladly enjoy denouncing each of them.
Yeah it was definitely overrated!!!!!!!!! Everyone says it was great, but in actuality it was a ****!!!!!!!!!! Cotto got raped!!!!!!!!!! Took such a beating from corner to corner, tasted the canvas a few times, even Margo beating was less brutal!!!!!!!!! yep, it was totally overrated!!!!!!!!
Cotto beat Mosely? He fought all the top Welterweights out there, Clottey, Margharito, Mosely the list goes on. Cotto is a TOP WW who lost to an All time great.
Pacquiao looked almost invincible. Yeah he got caught good a couple of times but that's what happens. I have no idea why people talk about stuff like that so often. Some of my favourite fighters of all-time, such as Marvin Hagler and Larry Holmes for example, took a lot of shots every fight. You get hit, big deal.
I knew it! Cotto was shot, right? Nobody thought about it before but you knew very well that Cotto was shot! Boy, you're really great!:happy:happy:happy
lol his defense is ugly? yeah pacman is landing 50 power punches while cotto is landing 15....whos defense got holes? defence = the fence defense = guard
Hatton at 140. As much as it pains me to remind you - The lineal champ who beat your namesake. Cotto was a top 5 welter. That's his last two fights alone.
Problem is, Cotto's strength and capacity to physically dominate Pac was his greatest suppossed asset and chance going into the fight. . .once I saw he didn't have that supposed advantage well I wrote him off.
YOu still cling to image of Pac in the JMM fight. Amazing how you assess a fighter using ancient history.