Was Roy Jones a paper champion??

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by bailey, Feb 18, 2011.


  1. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    82,092
    22,173
    Sep 15, 2009
    You're missing the point. We are not saying jones was never seen as the best fighter in a division. We are saying he never beat the man in a lineal sense.
     
  2. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    82,092
    22,173
    Sep 15, 2009
    As far as I see it, it is clear that jones would have been the favourite over any active lightheavyweight at the time.

    But you cannot deny that the lineal belt holder was dariusz. He was the man who beat hill, the man who unified 3 belts until politics stepped in.

    Ofcourse I believe jones would have beaten dariusz, but My definition of the man is the lineal champ, ergo the guy who beat the man. That is something jones never achieved in his career. Doesn't make him a worse fighter, but it does mean I never saw him as the man.

    Bailley gave a great example with hatton and floyd. Only a fool would rate hatton above floyd, yet hatton was the man at the weight.
     
  3. Jorodz

    Jorodz watching Gatti Ward 1... Full Member

    21,677
    52
    Sep 8, 2007
    i'm with you on most of your points (bailey's analogy is apt as well) but the lineage is not so firm for me at 175. frankly, i consider it up in the air as to when and by whom the lineage was established.

    it's being assumed dariusz got it from hill BUT why? cause hill unified? that's not necessarily a new lineage. i tend to lean towards ring (i know bailey, it's flawed) but if i go to ring for my lineage, than i go with jones
     
  4. bailey

    bailey Loyal Member Full Member

    39,982
    3,110
    Dec 11, 2009
     
  5. bailey

    bailey Loyal Member Full Member

    39,982
    3,110
    Dec 11, 2009
    Im glad somebody understood :happy
     
  6. Jorodz

    Jorodz watching Gatti Ward 1... Full Member

    21,677
    52
    Sep 8, 2007
    it's argument with a lot of merit i understand. however, to deny that jones was "top dog" in the division regardless of lineage is preposterous
     
  7. Auracle21

    Auracle21 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,998
    5
    Jan 13, 2008
    haters will hate. jones is a sure hall of famer.
     
  8. Peppermint

    Peppermint Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,014
    18
    Sep 7, 2010
    Title he held:
    IBF Middleweight title.
    IBF Super Middleweight title
    WBC Light Heavyweight title
    WBA Light Heavyweight title
    IBO Light Heavyweight title
    WBF Light Heavyweight title
    IBA Light Heavyweight title
    IBF Light Heavyweight title
    NBA Light Heavyweight title
    The Ring Light Heavyweight title
    WBA Heavyweight title

    He won all those titles in the ring, so if was a paper champion, then that pretty much means that all the fighters that he won them off were paper champions, and the guys before them were paper champions too, and so on. You could argue that some of his defences were paper defenses, but he initially won each title against the best thatw as availible at the time. The only interm title he won was from McCallum, which he would lose in his first defence to an undefeated Griffin and win it back rematch. So, his WBC light heavyweight title is the only one that he initially won when it was vacant.
     
  9. HEADBANGER

    HEADBANGER TEAM ELITE GENERAL Full Member

    13,630
    655
    Oct 17, 2009


    some elite level debate in this thread and then that cum guzzling tranny queen auracle steps in with this post :lol:

    it comes as no surprise that this poster has a vcash total of just 51 :rofl
     
  10. Jorodz

    Jorodz watching Gatti Ward 1... Full Member

    21,677
    52
    Sep 8, 2007
    what took you so ****ing long banger?
     
  11. Rico Spadafora

    Rico Spadafora Master of Chins Full Member

    45,402
    3,824
    Feb 20, 2008
    you realize the majority of those were either vacant belts or do not matter at all (IBA,NBA,IBO, etc.) He literally had one belt given back to him (WBC) and the IBF and WBA belts belonged to DM he was stripped and Roy "won" them. Half those belts you listed were simply trinkets at the time Jones won them. Period.

    Jones then moved up to Heavyweight and handpicked John Ruiz a guy that had not had a KO in almost 5 years leading up to the fight and oh yeah he had no skill and somehow Jay Nady was the referee for that fight and Ruiz was not allowed to use his illegal holding, grabbing, clinching, mauling, wrestling octopus style. Jones won the fight fair and square but the "fight" itself was a complete farce. It was a joke. I have seen sparring sessions better than that.
     
  12. HEADBANGER

    HEADBANGER TEAM ELITE GENERAL Full Member

    13,630
    655
    Oct 17, 2009

    :D

    some good posts in here pal, makes good reading :deal

    but none quite as good as me calling auracle a cum guzzling tranny queen :rofl
     
  13. Nay_Sayer

    Nay_Sayer On Rick James Status banned Full Member

    15,707
    503
    May 25, 2009
    Exactly who did Jones beat to claim the legitimate 175lb title?
     
  14. 46and0

    46and0 It's irrefutable. Full Member

    7,011
    139
    Dec 6, 2008
    [ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CGCUuApI9Og[/ame]
     
  15. Rico Spadafora

    Rico Spadafora Master of Chins Full Member

    45,402
    3,824
    Feb 20, 2008

    To me 175 is the Division where he has the least claim. All those trinkets he won meant nothing and he never fought the #1 guy. Like Larry Merchant told him the interview is in YouTube "why do you keep fighting these meaningless Mandatory fights for these trinket belts Roy?" And Jones just stuttered and started talking about P4P #1 and Pensacola :lol::rofl and all that other BS.

    Then Merchant told him point blank "You are bigger than these meaningless Alphabet Organizations why don't you make some legit fights?" and then then interview was over.