Was Schmeling really robbed in his second fight with Sharkey?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Maxmomer, Aug 31, 2007.


  1. Maxmomer

    Maxmomer Boxing Addict Full Member

    7,373
    42
    Jun 28, 2007
    If so, any particular reason or was it just a bad decision? It's a shame, first that, then he doesn't get the title fight against Braddock after beating Louis, which I'm pretty sure he would have won.
     
  2. Pete47

    Pete47 Member Full Member

    256
    6
    Mar 3, 2007
    Jack Sharkey was an excellent boxer-puncher and I like to watch him. But from what I have read, Max Schmeling would have deserved a close decision or at least a draw. It was a tactical and technical fight without real highlights.
     
  3. The Long Count

    The Long Count Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    15,427
    8,871
    Oct 8, 2013
    Schmeling's "loss" to Sharkey in 1932 is maybe the biggest Robbery in a heavyweight title fight history. Almost everyone in the audience thought Schmeling was the clear winner including the current mayor of New York at the time and huge boxing fan James J. Walker and Gene Tunney the previous champion. As far as the press row I've read two diffrent reports on the fight one stated 22 of 25 newspaper men gave the fight to Schmeling and another said out of 15 ringside reporters 10 had Schmeling 3 had Sharkey and two had it even. You must also take into account that while Nazi Germany didn't come to power until 1933 and that while initially Schmeling was liked in America the way he had gained the championship on a foul left some with a bitter taste in their mouth and the fact that Sharkey was American-I must believe most of these ringsiders and fans "wanted" Sharkey to prevail. The fact so many had people were disgusted by the outcome lends me to believe that Sharkey clearly lost the fight by a wide margin. I read one ringside report that felt through 10 rounds Schmeling was up 6-4 and then swept the last five rounds. Making the fight an 11-4 outcome.
     
  4. Baclava

    Baclava Active Member Full Member

    678
    4
    Jan 9, 2013
    I think I saw a 30 minutes highlight of Schmeling-Sharkey II and I gotta say it was an insane robbery. Schmeling won this fight big.
     
  5. The Long Count

    The Long Count Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    15,427
    8,871
    Oct 8, 2013
    Schmeling's legacy is unjustly marred. He got hosed twice. First here in a fight he clearly won and then even with this "loss" when he defeated Joe Louis he was denied right to fight Braddock for title. A fight he likely would've won. So A) he would've had a longer title reign had the robbery not occurred or B) likely would've become the first 2x Heavyweight champion, not Patterson. Either way his legacy would greatly be enhanced. However I don't hold this "loss" against him...yes parts of the fight are availabe as well on youtube. From what little is available you can see how much sharper he is in this fight than Sharkey.
     
  6. Baclava

    Baclava Active Member Full Member

    678
    4
    Jan 9, 2013
  7. The Long Count

    The Long Count Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    15,427
    8,871
    Oct 8, 2013
    Wow I don't recall ever seeing this much actual footage of the fight. Thanks for finding and sharing. Going to watch it now. On a side note the referee was Gunboat Smith the very good "white hope" fighter who was a fellow navy man, like Sharkey and cast the deciding vote. Hmmmmmm. Maybe old serviceman camardarie pride played role?
     
  8. The Long Count

    The Long Count Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    15,427
    8,871
    Oct 8, 2013
    wow Thanks again the quality was incredible. What a travesty. The british commentator had it 15-0 for Schmeling. From what I saw it was hard to score any round for Sharkey he back pedaled whole fight was easy to hit and almost all his punches fell short and were thrown with 0 authority. The "fix" was in on this one. Probably to get Carnera his shot at crown.
     
  9. Baclava

    Baclava Active Member Full Member

    678
    4
    Jan 9, 2013
  10. The Long Count

    The Long Count Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    15,427
    8,871
    Oct 8, 2013
    Wow that's great thanks for the rare footage.
     
  11. Mendoza

    Mendoza Hrgovic = Next Heavyweight champion of the world. banned Full Member

    55,255
    10,354
    Jun 29, 2007

    Yep. Schmling won that fight. Boxing had a problem with judging in the 1930's and wasn't going to do favors to foreign born fighters such as Farr, Schmeling, and Godoy. The scoring was way off in some filmed matches.
     
  12. mattdonnellon

    mattdonnellon Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,617
    1,884
    Dec 2, 2006
    I think we can agree that Max should have got the win but a few did tab Sharkey-most likely his mates! I'm probably in a minority here but I think Sharkey was the better of the two by a shade.
     
  13. The Long Count

    The Long Count Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    15,427
    8,871
    Oct 8, 2013
    When Sharkey was good he was very good but he was more inconsistant than Schmeling. If this fight had been ruled correctley Schmeling has a prime run where he goes 32-1-1 his only loss being a first round KO to Gipsy Daniels up until the Max Baer match. That is pretty impressive including dominant wins over Young Stribling, Mickey Walker and a host of solid contenders like Uzcudun, Risko etc.

    Yeah guys like Farr and Godoy got the shaft alot although I do believe Louis beat them in both title shots. Of course he stopped Godoy in second match. Funny Carnera had no problems with judges Lol
     
  14. klompton2

    klompton2 Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    10,974
    5,432
    Feb 10, 2013
  15. outtieDrake

    outtieDrake Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,958
    1,480
    Dec 17, 2009
    you all make it sound like it was a one sided beating, i saw a long reach sharkey keeping Max At bay with the long reach of the jab and doubling up. no robbery just a bias commentating by a european commentator . if you watch it in mute you'll have a different opinion.