So Conte claims to have kept records, big deal. Lab results are of what importance? Mosley already admitted he took the ****. The argument is if he knew what he was taking or not. He passed the FBI's polygraph test stating that he didn't know he was being given illegal steroids. What more do you want?
Mosley doesn't have **** to explain, he already explained it, you jsut choose not to beleive him. And who the hell is the ****** that posted its **** easy to pass a polygraph?
Come on man, lighten up. Don't tell me I'm about to get a visit from a 235 lb Indian guy living in England with a big ass head. Should I be watching out my window.
My big question is, what should be done with his win from the second DeLaHoya fight? Should it be declared a no contest 5 years later? I mean the guy admitted he was on illegal supplements for that fight. Doesn't matter if he knew or not, the fight wasn't fair.
Indian:huh Dude your out of control! I aint Indian!! West Indian heritage yes but defintly no Indian in me or steroids home slice.
Why don't you explain why a polygraph is reliable? Noboby said it was "**** easy" to pass. But they are severly flawed. Thats why they can't be used as proof of anything.
So what if he was given a polygraph? Does anybody have a transcript? What if he cooperated, admitted to what he did, gave them some info and they let him off.....that happens, and that is most likely what happened.
ok even if he didn't know he was taking them, now the question becomes would he have won if he hadn't been taking them?
And you chose to ignore the evidence that implicates Mosley. Mosley claims he's going to sue Conte for defamation of character. We'll see if he goes through with it. I don't think he wants to put his word up against documented evidence. Once again, someone tell me what Conte has to gain by lying on Mosley?