Was Tarver really a 3-1 favourite against Hopkins?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by WhataRock, Nov 28, 2008.


  1. WhataRock

    WhataRock Loyal Member Full Member

    35,031
    18,306
    Jul 29, 2004
    I knew more people probably thought Tarver would take it at the time but I didnt realise he was that favoured.

    Ill admit I had my concerns on how Bernard would handle the weight but I still picked him to beat Tarver because I thought he was clearly the better boxer.

    I thought Nard's chin and defense would take Tarver's power out of the equation.

    My only concern was the size issue. As Nard had been feasting on mostly smaller guys around that time and was always an above average size for a middle.

    I really cant believe that Tarver was a 3-1 favourite though...crazyness in my opinion.
     
  2. Thread Stealer

    Thread Stealer Loyal Member Full Member

    41,963
    3,442
    Jun 30, 2005
    The one that's more shocking to me is that Winky Wright was a 3-1 underdog against Shane Mosley.
     
  3. WhataRock

    WhataRock Loyal Member Full Member

    35,031
    18,306
    Jul 29, 2004
    I was even sucked in by that a bit..I leaned towards Mosley in what I thought was an even money fight.

    Really didnt end up that way.
     
  4. PH|LLA

    PH|LLA VIP Member Full Member

    79,438
    2,646
    Feb 1, 2007
    Hopkins coming off 2 losses, Tarver coming off the RJJ trilogy and a win of Johnson

    Hopkins moving up 2 weight classes at 40+ years old
     
  5. Scar

    Scar VIP Member Full Member

    76,120
    2,760
    Jul 20, 2004
    It was hardly crazy if you experienced it when it actually happened, not saying you probably didn't but almost everyone picked against Bernard in this one, it was also worse than the Pavlik fight which was quite similar.

    Let's face it, Bernard was 41 years old at the time, Tarver was coming off a major victory over Roy Jones in a third fight, a fight where many were actually giving Roy a chance even though he was the underdog. Bernard was coming off two losses to Taylor, the first fight was controversial but the rematch was a clear win for Taylor. Even though that's a LIST of negatives for Bernard the worst part comes here, he was moving up two divisions in weight to fight Tarver, something SRR tried to do and failed, which is what made it WAY worse and against the best Light Heavyweight. No one thought Bernard will be able to do anything in this one, the majority picked Tarver by KO and the other few picked Tarver by clear one-sided UD in a fight where Bernard doesn't throw much and stays on the defensive leaving Tarver to score rounds easily. I remember I picked Bernard to win that fight though I admit my confidence in that prediction was very low.
     
  6. Scar

    Scar VIP Member Full Member

    76,120
    2,760
    Jul 20, 2004
    Hopkins being the underdog was hardly shocking at the time, it's just that people like to pretend "WOW, how can he be an underdog like that! :shock:" when the result is out. Wright being the underdog wasn't that shocking either, Winky was unknown at the time and hasn't proven his skills against enough elite fighters for the bookies to make him the favorite. Though Hopkins being the underdog made far more sense but both seemed logical at the time and that can't be denied even after the result was out.
     
  7. WhataRock

    WhataRock Loyal Member Full Member

    35,031
    18,306
    Jul 29, 2004
    I was working on a shutdown at a refinery over the other side of the country in the middle of 06...So I missed most of the talk about it and wasnt on the boards seeing everyones opinion. So I probably did miss most of it.

    I just saw it as much better smaller fighter moving up and that would be the biggest issue.
     
  8. codeman99998

    codeman99998 Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,713
    1
    Aug 28, 2006
    Ali was a 7-1 underdog to Liston in their first fight. After the fights happen, things become much clearer.
     
  9. Thread Stealer

    Thread Stealer Loyal Member Full Member

    41,963
    3,442
    Jun 30, 2005
    But Mosley had been performing poorly as of late. He had those 2 fights with Forrest where he looked terrible, and even the DLH rematch, he didn't look very good.

    Wright at least had been seen as one of the top 154 lbers, but hadn't gotten a fight with a big name since 1999.

    The majority of people on the boxing forums I was on picked Wright, so did I, that's why I was surprised that it was 3-1. With the name recognition, I figured that Shane might've been the betting favorite, but I thought it would've been much closer odds.
     
  10. heart

    heart Active Member Full Member

    1,058
    0
    Jul 3, 2008
    thats it.
     
  11. gambleer

    gambleer Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,714
    227
    Sep 28, 2007
    Yeah, but Tarver had to lose a lot of pounds in a short time after the Balboa movie.
     
  12. Scar

    Scar VIP Member Full Member

    76,120
    2,760
    Jul 20, 2004
    -Moving up two weight divisions against one of the most dangerous fighters in the sport at the time and top 10 P4P. Not to forget Tarver was coming off a major victory over Jones and Johnson.

    -41 years old.

    -Coming off two major losses at Middleweight.

    Sounds VERY fair to me that he was the underdog, even if you look at it right now and ignore what happened you will still see it as impossible for Hopkins to win or even make it to the final bell.
     
  13. Scar

    Scar VIP Member Full Member

    76,120
    2,760
    Jul 20, 2004
    You could also bring up Trinidad vs Wright, this comes close with Mosley vs Wright even though Wright made it on the big scene already after beating Mosley twice yet still was the underdog there as well.

    You make some good points there then again Wright was still unknown at that point and his loss to Vargas(the only big name you could mention) didn't help pick him as the favorite. Despite looking bad against DLH in the rematch, Mosley still got the victory there(a victory I disagree with even as a huge Mosley fan).
     
  14. Scar

    Scar VIP Member Full Member

    76,120
    2,760
    Jul 20, 2004
    No one really gave a damn about that, as far as I remember none even brought it up till the fight was over with and that's not only on ESB but many other boxing sites/articles. It was still looked at as a movie and nothing serious enough to pick Hopkins over Tarver for.

    You can put it this way. Hopkins is 41 years old, coming off two major losses at middleweight, moving up two weight divisions above to fight the #1 fighter at Light Heavyweight. Tarver is coming off a major win over Jones and is losing a lot of pounds for a MOVIE. Which one looks worse?, FAR worse that is.
     
  15. Boom_Boom

    Boom_Boom R.I.P Boxing 6/9/12 Full Member

    38,291
    23
    Sep 21, 2006
    oh please, dont you people start acting like you knew Hopkins was going to win it and could never understand why he was the underdpg.

    Almost everybody was picking Tarver and the most hardcore Hopkins fans were just hoping that Hopkins puts up a good fight and last all 12 rounds.