Was the 80s actually stronger than the 70s heavyweight era

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by MarkusFlorez99, Nov 2, 2025.


  1. Cojimar 1946

    Cojimar 1946 Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,557
    2,224
    Nov 23, 2014
    Aside from an upset win over Ali Norton didn't accomplish that much.

    Why would he rate above Thomas, Witherspoon etc?

    You can rate him however you like but for me that's roughly Norton's level
     
    Last edited: Nov 6, 2025
  2. Seamus

    Seamus Proud Kulak Full Member

    66,133
    53,517
    Feb 11, 2005
    You just cancelled your argument by rattling off so many talented heavies off the top of your head, not even mentioning Holmes, Weaver, Bonecrusher, Cooney, Tyson, Spinks... too many to name.

    But thanks for starting the heavy lifting with the above comment. Now you can return to your Mando Ramos highlight reel.
     
  3. young griffo

    young griffo Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,848
    8,087
    May 18, 2006
    I could have mentioned more “talented” heavies from that era that didn’t do squat legacy wise, Holmes and Tyson excepted (Spinks was great at Lt Heavy of course but not so much at Heavyweight ) you just did it for me. I mean Mike Weaver was a good sparring partner for Kenny Norton though.

    Now I’ll leave you to fap yourself to your David Bey, Greg Page and Quick Tillis highlight reels (better skip the ones where ancient Aussie Joe Bugner a has been from the 70’s boxed their ears off though lol)

    By the way Mando Ramos was a lightweight boxer. Bloody good fighter but not germane to a conversation about the big boys surely?
     
  4. Sangria

    Sangria You bleed like Mylee Full Member

    9,144
    4,091
    Nov 13, 2010
    Oh I agree with you about the 80's. The Top 40 talent was deeper as these were the progeny of Ali.

    I disagreed about 1990 being in the 80's.