Was the brawl in Montreal better than JCC v Meldrick Taylor?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by mark ant, May 20, 2018.



  1. mark ant

    mark ant Canelo was never athletic Full Member

    36,654
    16,430
    May 4, 2017
    Leonard`s reach would be too much, he would out jab Meldrick that`s why Taylor struggled at welter along with not being able to take a solid welter shot.
     
  2. Thread Stealer

    Thread Stealer VIP Member Full Member

    41,613
    2,609
    Jun 30, 2005
    I hardly give Taylor much of a chance and beating Leonard. Leonard was better than Taylor in every aspect of the sport except maybe for handspeed, and Leonard was extremely fast too.

    Taylor was excellent during his peak at 140 and good for short time at 147, but Leonard from 1979-82 is one of the best fighters there’s ever been. Plus he also is naturally bigger than Taylor.
     
    The Morlocks likes this.
  3. JohnThomas1

    JohnThomas1 VIP Member Full Member

    48,241
    35,033
    Apr 27, 2005
    SRL would beat Taylor every day of the week.
     
    ETM, KuRuPT and The Morlocks like this.
  4. KuRuPT

    KuRuPT Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,462
    2,771
    Aug 26, 2011
    and twice on Sunday....
     
    JohnThomas1 and The Morlocks like this.
  5. Matt Bargas

    Matt Bargas Member Full Member

    253
    141
    Mar 17, 2018
    Taylor fought the wrong fight against Chavez. He got way to close and that neutralized his hand speed.
     
  6. mark ant

    mark ant Canelo was never athletic Full Member

    36,654
    16,430
    May 4, 2017
    This content is protected
     
  7. redrooster

    redrooster Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,636
    330
    Jan 29, 2005
    Chavez taylor for me. Leonard duran had too much holding while chavez taylor saw more actual fighting and drama.
     
  8. Tramell

    Tramell Hypocrites Love to Pray & Be Seen. Mathew 6:5 Full Member

    4,474
    3,843
    Sep 21, 2012
    Same for me. A lot of grappling. As Dundee said, Duran was being Duran, but Ray went along with it.

    Meldrick's combinations and speed was transparent, but so, too was the countering of JCC, so strong. Whereas with Ray vs Duran at times it was difficult to tell how much Ray was being broken down.

    And the ending for JCC/Taylor wow, so heartbreaking, but if one werent a Taylor fan, they'd call it dramatic.

    Both were great fights in their own right!
     
  9. ETM

    ETM I thought I did enough to win. Full Member

    12,608
    10,372
    Mar 19, 2012
    Montreal was less a great fight and more of an exhibition of Boxing by Duran. Leonard showed his quality as well but he had trouble finding Duran with clean shots.

    Meldrick fought his heart out but he lacked defense or a defensive mindset. By the last round Taylor couldn't have moved or stayed away. His entire body was beaten.

    Made for great TV
     
  10. Flash24

    Flash24 Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,725
    7,797
    Oct 22, 2015
    No he wasn't a better fighter, and Taylor wouldn't have beaten Leonard if their weight was even. Even before the Chavez fight against far lesser competition I saw a big weakness In Taylor's fight game. 1st, for a fighter and fast as he was he got hit cleanly and far to often. 2nd, he was an accumulation puncher, and I always thought his defensive lapses and his lack of true punishing power would be his down fall. And then came Chavez. Duran vs Leonard #1 was a fight between two fighters universally considered ATG's and fought at an extreme high pace and skill level for 15 rds. If Chavez vs Taylor was a 15 rd fight. Their wouldn't have been a controversy. While most would say Taylor had great physical skills, very few consider him a ATG. Hell, more than a few look at Chavez with reservations as far as being ATG ( I don't, but he isn't on Leonard's or Durans level) In my opnion The Brawl in Montreal between two proven greats of the game far exceeds anything Chavez vs Taylor showed.
     
    Last edited: May 24, 2018