Do you guys think that it was a fair ruling? There are people in the opinion that he didn't know and so the CSAC's ruling was harsh. What do you guys think? I think with all the information known so far that it's a fair decision, but that it may need revised depending on the findings in March?
Rulings should be imposed after an official investigation. A suspension is fair up until the results, only then should be decided if it will be extended or will be lifted.
Commish should have suspended Margo's license UNTIL the lab results were back and then make their decision.Margo was pronounced guilty BEFORE any results were announced.That is pure bull****. Does the law of the land not apply in Cali?:huh
I picked no tough enough, and the reason for that is Margo has no plans to sit out...Which I truely believe will lead him to never getting to fight in Cal again, which may also lead to him having a very hard time fighting anywere in the States.....You do the crime do the ****ing time... Secondly Margo would have not fought for 5 to 6 months anyways, so what it costed him a fight vs some bum that he would have fought to get going again...
you know, margo got punished for being the "HEAD" of his camp....what whould happen to the idiot from THE CSAC that allowed the knuckle pad in the first place......
OMG...Im done with this subject...Margo has the dumbest fans ever...I think you may have just pushed Margo fans to the top of the most worst fans list:good Good Job.
not even a fan. :dead I try to be reasonable. Unlike some who lets their emotions get the better of them. **** Margo btw:good