Was the CSAC ruling fair in the Margo hearing?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by lern1079, Feb 13, 2009.


  1. **** if anything the punishment wasn't harsh enough:-(the ****ing cheater got what he deserved:good
    he can kiss his career goodbye:yep nobody worth a **** is going to want to fight him out side the USA, i only wish Mosley would have beat him worse:dead
     
  2. charlievint

    charlievint Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,338
    1
    Jul 22, 2004
    I said Fair...but I think its too harsh considering that there was NO PLASTER like material or Blocks that were originally reported. For Capetillo that is....Licenced Revoked??? A bit harsh but a years suspsension that is fine. It was cheating anyway you want to cut it.....but taking a mans lively hood due to over the top allegations is extreme. Capetillo should have been fined and suspeneded.
     
  3. IsaL

    IsaL VIP Member Full Member

    50,553
    18,242
    Oct 7, 2006
    Considering that fighters have gotten away with CHEATED with no penalty, and Margo got caught BEFORE cheating, I voted too harsh.
     
  4. Kush

    Kush Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    27,095
    980
    Dec 16, 2007
    CSAC is just another name for the KKK. At least have the damn evidence present during the hearing.