Was the DLH-Sweet Pea decision controversial?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Dostoevsky, Dec 9, 2007.


  1. Dostoevsky

    Dostoevsky Hardcore......to the max! Full Member

    5,691
    6
    Jun 17, 2007
    I'm too young to remember that fight and never hear much about it and I've never seen it either :)()
    All I know is that DLH was knocked down in the 9th and thought perhaps the decision was controversial as I know that Sweet Pea was screwed before in his career with the Chavez decision.

    Was the score legit?
     
  2. cpnasty

    cpnasty Fight Fan 83 Full Member

    4,663
    5
    May 1, 2005

    Whitaker was robbed! It was very contoversial but nothing like the Chavez fight.
     
  3. kg0208

    kg0208 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,031
    6
    Aug 8, 2005
    It was controversial....many feel that Whitaker wasn't actually beaten until Trinidad beat a very bad version.
     
  4. brownpimp88

    brownpimp88 Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,378
    10
    Feb 26, 2007
    its on youtube so u can watch it and tell us what u think.
     
  5. markbrooklyn

    markbrooklyn Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,039
    2
    Aug 5, 2006
    Yeah Sweet Pea was definetly robbed, I remember way back when watching this fight and I thought Sweet Pea definetly won and i was shocked that they gave Delahoya the decision
     
  6. gambleer

    gambleer Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,714
    227
    Sep 28, 2007
    I had 7-5 for DLH. Letterman had it even.
     
  7. bigtime9

    bigtime9 Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,980
    0
    May 11, 2006
    it was not controversial..sweet pea lost because he didn't throw any power punches. you can't beat oscar with just a jab and defense. I scoed 7-5 for hoya easily.
     
  8. kg0208

    kg0208 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,031
    6
    Aug 8, 2005
    You can if you land far more. Besides, you can't really judge based on that can you? If you land more power punches you automatically win?
     
  9. cpnasty

    cpnasty Fight Fan 83 Full Member

    4,663
    5
    May 1, 2005
    Oscar missed all night long and the refs gave it to him because he was the future. Without a doubt a robbery
     
  10. bigtime9

    bigtime9 Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,980
    0
    May 11, 2006
    hey I wanted sweet pea to win but he didn't throw any power shots. he acted like he was afraid to engage hoya who was open for some power shots. sweet pea kept throwing that soft jab and parrying oscar's shots but oscar was landing and was very agressive in pressing sweet pea.

    Oscar was just too big for sweet pea same with trinidad. either they were too big and young or sweet pea was on the snow real bad.
     
  11. Dostoevsky

    Dostoevsky Hardcore......to the max! Full Member

    5,691
    6
    Jun 17, 2007
    So did Whitaker drop DLH with a jab?.....damn.
     
  12. chimba

    chimba Off the Somali Coast Full Member

    20,005
    7
    Mar 8, 2007
    a coked up Pea gave Oscar a scare although I thought Oscar won...Prime Sweat Pea...dont even ask
     
  13. kg0208

    kg0208 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,031
    6
    Aug 8, 2005
    He landed more punches and threw more as well, so he was certainly engaged enough to accomplish that. He also landed at a higher connect rate. Oscar was barely landing anything. Landing more power punches doesn't mean you win. Not if you are outlanded so badly.
     
  14. cpnasty

    cpnasty Fight Fan 83 Full Member

    4,663
    5
    May 1, 2005
    You can't win a fight without landing punches. Well, except if you're Oscar
     
  15. sweet_scientist

    sweet_scientist Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,744
    88
    Nov 8, 2004
    Fight could have gone either way, it wasn't a robbery. But the judges' scorecards were pathetic, as they were in plenty of Whitaker's fights.

    Personally I had it for Pea by a point. I think DLH was grazing or not connecting cleanly with a lot of his power punches, so the disparity in power shots landed on the compubox stats were sort of besides the point.