was the PAC-JMM III the most closely analysed fight in boxing history?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Stinky gloves, Nov 20, 2011.


  1. Stinky gloves

    Stinky gloves Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    17,255
    14
    May 31, 2007
    The enormous number or slow motion clips on which people were
    counting single punches in each round and their overall significance ....

    ... if no then which fight was?
     
    Stinky gloves, Nov 20, 2011
    Stinky gloves, Nov 20, 2011
    #1
  2. timeout

    timeout Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    18,718
    3,533
    Jun 15, 2010
    Mayweather vs Castillo.
    Now that was a robbery.
     
    timeout, Nov 20, 2011
    timeout, Nov 20, 2011
    #2
  3. igor_otsky

    igor_otsky Undefeated Full Member

    14,285
    6
    Jul 26, 2008
    Kirkland vs Ishida was the most analized fight ever. They were hard to figure out how a bum would KO a young prospect in Kirkland.
     
    igor_otsky, Nov 20, 2011
    igor_otsky, Nov 20, 2011
    #3
  4. JCC_is_overated

    JCC_is_overated FACT Full Member

    654
    0
    Jul 29, 2011
    Hopkins vs. Calzaghe

    Further closer review shows that Hopkins did in fact got robbed. Calzaghe just threw too many slaps that looked like they were landing but in fact were not.

    This clip right here tells the whole story of how the fight went.

    This content is protected
     
    JCC_is_overated, Nov 20, 2011
    JCC_is_overated, Nov 20, 2011
    #4
  5. timeout

    timeout Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    18,718
    3,533
    Jun 15, 2010
    :good
    i always thought this was more appropriate...

    Following a brutal precision punches that JC received.
    In 12 rds that followed.

    This content is protected
     
    timeout, Nov 20, 2011
    timeout, Nov 20, 2011
    #5