Was Wlad's win over Mercer significant?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Asterion, Jun 3, 2012.


  1. Asterion

    Asterion Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,459
    20
    Feb 5, 2005
    His win in 2002 over Mercer, was it an important "event" and is it a significant win in his resume?

    I mean...Mercer was a contender until 1998 and this was in 2002.
     
  2. DrMo

    DrMo Team GB Full Member

    22,198
    20
    Jan 29, 2011
  3. silenc

    silenc dropout bear Full Member

    1,139
    18
    Nov 15, 2009
    If so then Holmes win over Mercer should have been one of the TOP 5 victories in HW division.
     
  4. Ilesey

    Ilesey ~ Full Member

    38,201
    2,600
    Jul 22, 2004
  5. WiDDoW_MaKeR

    WiDDoW_MaKeR ESB Hall of Fame Member Full Member

    37,427
    89
    Jul 19, 2004
    Mercer was in very good shape and still was a very dangerous fighter. Wlad's offense that night was absolutely amazing. It wasn't a "great win" on his resume, but it was a good win, and a very impressive performance.
     
  6. Bazooka

    Bazooka Pimp C Wants 2 Be Me Full Member

    44,390
    5
    Oct 23, 2005
    Thats a four year gap and I am going to be real Mercer wasnt live since the mid 90s
     
  7. Slyk

    Slyk Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,714
    4,405
    Dec 5, 2010
    Good display of his arsenal at least. One of the best arsenals HW boxing has ever seen.
     
  8. exocet76

    exocet76 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,334
    17,555
    Feb 28, 2012
    That's some funny **** your smoking, Mercer was a corpse by then, 10 years before he was tough mofo who was difficult to beat, go ask Lennox.
     
  9. Boxing Gloves

    Boxing Gloves Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,517
    1,586
    Jul 19, 2004
    At the time I was impressed that he managed to stop an iron chinned Mercer but with hindsite I look at it a lot less impressivly. He was 41 and had not fought a live body since 1996. He also got knocked out by Briggs 18 months after the fight.
     
  10. Momus

    Momus Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,732
    2,571
    Nov 27, 2010
    Impressive? Yes.

    Significant? Hell no.
     
  11. Whipdatass

    Whipdatass Boxing Junkie banned

    9,353
    2
    Aug 18, 2011
    Hell no. Wlad almost ran out of gas, and his face was swelling up too. AND that was a shot Mercer at that.
     
  12. kenmore

    kenmore Boxing Addict Full Member

    7,132
    28
    Jan 29, 2008
    The win was not significant in terms of impacting the world ratings. The victory did not establish or build upon Vlad's credentials as a world-beater, either. Vlad had already made his mark by whipping top rated Chris Byrd in 2001, and he would build upon that win by KO'ing top contender Jameel McCline later in 2002. Mercer was deeply faded, aging, and no longer world ranked when he fought Vlad.

    However, the fight was significant because of the decisiveness of Vlad's victory. Although no longer a contender, Mercer was still durable, and had not yet been stopped by anyone. Vlad got the job done in exciting, devastating fashion, blasting Mercer into oblivion in six rounds.

    The Mercer win supplemented, but didn't match, the cred Vlad established by clobbering Byrd and McCline.
     
  13. kenmore

    kenmore Boxing Addict Full Member

    7,132
    28
    Jan 29, 2008
    Exaggerations.
     
  14. StillWill

    StillWill Dr. Eisenfaust Full Member

    3,265
    12
    Jul 12, 2010
    Wlad was supposed to win this fight, but the way he won it was superb - he looked absolutely devastating. Hence why nobody wanted to fight him after that, except a certain Corrie Sanders !
     
  15. SugarShane_24

    SugarShane_24 ESB good-looking member Full Member

    8,929
    39
    Jul 21, 2004
    That Mercer was still able to stop Tim Silvia by one-punch even at 50 was awesome.

    Wlad's win over Mercer was nonetheless impressive. :lol::lol:

    I know, it's unrelated bull****.