Ane info is greatly appreaciated thanxhttp://www.eastsideboxing.com/forum/images/smilies/kopfpatsch.gif
Swarmers can be strong against anything if they take people out of their comfort zone. However, a good outfighter will be very difficult to catch and will probably hurt you for your troubles. Imo if you're gonna use that style you need some serious power. You'll need it as swarming is tiring and you'll want to either finish the guy reasonably quickly or hurt him enough to slow him down. If you've got serious power and a good chin you'll probably out perform 'pure' sluggers.
I say good swarmers are best against boxers, they crowd and catch boxers as theres not a lot of space in a ring. Swamers normally have to be good at catching a beating but they will apply constant pressure until you crack so therefore they do best against guys who will succumb to solid domination and that can be in any style. swarmers ideal style for fighting but you have to be in ultimate condition and preperation to crack another man otherwise you're just a punching bag. [ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o_NYZgErky4[/ame] very recently a swarmer tough nobody beat a skilled world champion boxer in hard heavy fashion. Also watch Cotto - Margerito to see a man boxing and hitting eventually to be broken down by a goodswarmer
Well typically you are looking at matching-up better against boxers as a swarmer. You should be better matched against boxers because swarmers - unlike sluggers - are more educated pressure fighters and can close the ring down, preventing the boxer from establishing his range and closing down their punching room and you can set a hi-tempo which they will often find difficult to contend with. See Frazier vs Ali FOTC. Swarmers typically struggle against sluggers because here you have a swarmer coming forward and trying to pressure a guy who is normally stronger, bigger and more powerful and will be happy for a guy to stay in his punching range so they can trade blows. See Frazier vs Foreman.
Swarmer vs boxer is the classic matchup. Who wins will be the one who can implement his gameplan more. In amateu boxing the boxer has an advantage because the fight is only a couple rounds. In pro boxing, the boxer may win the first couple rounds by staying away and scoring, but as the fight wears on the boxer will slow down from the constant pressure and the swarmer will come on in the later rounds.
I personally don't believe in this style beats which, I think it all depends on how well the fighter can inforce him gameplan