Watch this just pisses me off again!

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by tliang1000, May 29, 2011.


  1. WarpedDesign

    WarpedDesign Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,345
    1
    Aug 31, 2010
    It was close. Just very glad they didn't give the decision to Dirrell. The guy is a joke. Stunk the whole fight out. Then pulls all that Dr Shaw High BS. He could be one of the best but he is mentally weak. I cannot see much of a future for Dirrell unless he visits the Wizard of Oz for a new heart.
     
  2. DOM5153

    DOM5153 They Cannot Run Forever Full Member

    12,340
    1
    Jan 9, 2009
  3. zarman

    zarman Guest

    How anyone could have Dirrell up by more than a round is beyond me
     
  4. RedDragonBoxing

    RedDragonBoxing Ametuer Boxer Full Member

    3,094
    0
    Feb 7, 2009
    I was a froch hater when i saw this fight and was rooting for dirrell.

    Froch 115-113
     
  5. godlikerich

    godlikerich Active Member Full Member

    1,188
    1
    Aug 27, 2010
    I think Froch was lucky to win but Dirrell was so negative I can see why Froch got the nod. Froch landed more shots if you look at the punch stats: Dirrell's blows were cleaner. That's fine. But as soon as Froch closed range Dirrell held and held and ducked his head below waist level and presented the back of his head. If you do that I think the other guy is perfectly justified in cracking you in the back of the head. Look at Johnson vs Green and no one complains about that - and rightly.Turning away like that and ducking like that is illegal. Deal with it. Having said that Dirrell is clearly the more fluid, skilled boxer, but your defence cannot be falling over and holding. That's not skill that's taking the easy option. Dirrel felt Froch's strength and wanted none of it. He was negative as a result, and that is why he lost.
     
  6. Joe.Boxer

    Joe.Boxer Chinchecker Full Member

    7,741
    1,251
    Jan 8, 2011
    After reading all the whining, I finally forced myself to watch this fight.

    It was no robbery you ****in bellends. All the way through, it was way too scrappy with not enough shots landed from either fighter to make anything clear.
     
  7. Larryboys

    Larryboys Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,648
    2
    Sep 6, 2008
    Most people think Dirrell won but robbery is a bit much, some rounds he did absolutely nothing but skip around the ring. If he's too stupid to realise that you have to press the matter a little bit more to win a guys title off him in his own home town, even though hometown decisions have been the way things are since boxing started, then he's only got himself to blame. That vidoe is a load of bollocks too, I could chop 3 minutes of Froch success out of a 36 minute fight to make it look like he dominated too.
     
  8. HAYEDAJOKE

    HAYEDAJOKE Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,115
    0
    Jan 11, 2011
    stupid. such a bias vid and what was the copy box?

    and cintron vs martinez was a way bigger robbery
     
  9. tliang1000

    tliang1000 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    20,112
    7
    Aug 18, 2007
    u can't chop 3 mins worth of froch landing bc he didn't land ****.
     
  10. DobyZhee

    DobyZhee VIP Member

    51,768
    17,296
    Mar 5, 2006
    dirrell had the balls to fight outside his own country. Ward's afraid of fighting outside his home state.
     
  11. MichiganWarrior

    MichiganWarrior Still Slick! Still Black! Full Member

    26,793
    7
    Mar 20, 2010
    :lol::good
     
  12. MichiganWarrior

    MichiganWarrior Still Slick! Still Black! Full Member

    26,793
    7
    Mar 20, 2010
    It'd have to be 115-112. There was a 9-9/10-8 round in there.


    Btw, no way Froch won 6 rounds let alone 7.
     
  13. bazza12

    bazza12 Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,561
    5
    Sep 26, 2009
    Can't we just accept it was a **** fight and neither had their best night?

    Dirrell was constantly falling over and ran round the ring at stages. Froch definitely got hit by the cleaner punches, but it was close. Not a robbery in my opinion.
     
  14. Mitch Green

    Mitch Green Guest

    ergardless of what you think about Dirrell's Negatively he still landed the more clean effective blows and that's what scoring fights is supposed to be based on. There no guidelines that I'm aware of that say your supposed to penalize a guy for fighting a spoiler type of fight.
     
  15. bballchump11

    bballchump11 2011 Poster of the Year Full Member

    63,174
    24
    Oct 27, 2010
    :rofl