Watched Pacquiao/Marquez II again

Sorry, my bad, I have seen the first 5 rounds and they are not difficult to score here is what I have:

1. Pac 10-9
2. JMM 10-9 (clearly)
3. Pac 10-8 (clearly)
4. Pac 10-9 (clearly)
5. JMM 10-9 (clearly)

 

referees were at ringside when jmm feet was so way up into the air in the 3rd round.

referees were at ringside when jmm wobbled and hang on the ropes for dear life to prevent a kd being called. and with all the close rounds, it would have been silly for the refs to award it to jmm UD. jmm clearly lost in two judges scorecards. the fact that one scored it 115-112 is highly understandable since pac was being the aggressor throughout.

hence, if the close round were not called even by the judges and was awarded to the aggressive fighter, plus the two KD, the 115-112 scorecard is to be honest highly justified.

 

not realy divac. if it was scored an SD for JMM it would have been ok. or even a draw.

what pisses me are all these wannabe princess crying a bucket that is was robbery.

pac sent jmm to the canvass in 3rd round.
KD him again in the 10th if i am not mistaken but jmm hang on to the ropes for dear life.

2 KDs in one fight. with 2-3 rounds about even which can go other way and you insist that jmm won the fight like it was a robbery?

 

around 12 times. half on my PC, and half on my PSP while travelling.

 

The 1st fight was way different on how Pac fought in the 2nd fight.
Pac was able to parry Marquez's punches w/ his gloves. He fought w/ controlled agression. Pac was not reckless and avoided possible counterpunches by Marquez. Pac was the clear because he knocked down Marquez and got him wobbled so that he followed Pac to his corner.

 

:rofl:rofl:rofl

that was one of the funniest scenes i have ever scene in boxing. probably made the jmm fans cringe in embarassment.

 

hmm says.... it's easy to score rounds 10-9 or whatever.... But what I'm noticing and what a lot of you folks are forgetting is that

This content is protected

(omit accidental cuts caused by headbutt etc). It's a fact that some judges look for in scoring. I had Pac winning the 2nd fight by one point and I had Pac winning the first by one via knockdown (one of the judges scored incorrectly). I don't argue who lost or won the first or second because the fights were close and could've gone either way....

 

:yep

hilarious... you are ignoring the truth that your boy held on that rope for dear life 10-7 :good

This content is protected

after july 18, your boy wont avenge his 4 times kissing the canvass :yep:yep

 

Grow up, Harrison. atsch

You're an embarrassment to yourself and Manny Pacquiao.

 

truth hurts :hey:hey:good:good

10-7 :good

and if you dont know how to score it... re watch the GIF again :yep:yep

 

As naive as you are Harrison, even you must realize that if the referee didn't count it as a knockdown then nor should the panel of judges.

End of discussion.

 

I'll see that and raise you another. I was watching a Bobby Czyz fight the other night and he floored his opponent near the end of the round. Czyz went to his stool and sat down while his opponent followed him and then tried to get him off his own stool so he could sit down. It took the opponent about 15 seconds to realise he was in the wrong corner and wobble back to his own, with a huge cheer from the crowd.

 

and, they must realize (That includes you) that there are official judges to score the fight and not whine or be a cry baby here :good:good

end of discussion ...:yep

 

O dude, that avator is simply amazing. Damn good work.

 

not so much of a techie but i will try to look for it. quite hilarious the way you describe it. :rofl