Watched Pacquiao/Marquez II again

This debate just goes on and on for the simple matter that some crybabies cannot live because Pac was given the GIFT of W and not JMM, plain and simple really. By the way aint a *******, a valerotard would be accurate lols

 

Hey Harrison, how about actually explaining why you keep bringing up that the 3rd round should have been 10-7?

You believe Pac won the fight regardless of how the 3rd round was scored........so why keep bringing up the same thing over and over again about the 3rd round should have been 10-7?

Could it be that you're not accepting of your own score and are still trying to convince yourself that the 3rd round should have been 10-7, in order to feel better about that audacity of your score???:hey

Get over that, only one knockdown was scored in the round and each judge has to abide by how the ref rules it in such case.
JMM's gloves or trunks never touched the canvas......its ridiculously laughable how you keep grasping at straws on this matter.

 

harrison,

have been trying to understand why some jmm fans always talk about jmm winning both fights against pac?!

why do they have this illusion?! here's why?!

the win over jaca, salido,ultra prime casa and baby "so called bull" diaz did not give pac enough recognition!

but his close two fight with pac did!!!!!

jmm needs a big win over pbf or pac to be truly recognized. as of know he is still chasing the shadows of pac..



ouch! the truth hurts!!!!!

 

look at the position of both feet? and for the record, ropes are there to provide a boundary for the ring area at same time ensure that fighters stay within the ring at the same time giving the spectators and unimpaired view of the fight.

ropes are not there to prevent a legitimate KD being called.

 

Cmon this is not even a debate just making clrear who won the fight, just look at my scores in each round and tell me which round you would score it different, just go to you tube and watch it, if there is a round you dont agree tell me which one and why, the rounds are not hard to score but the final score is very close and dont tell me the 3rd round you would score it 10-7 thats just incorrect...

 

here we go again!

YOU DON'T RECOGNIZE THE JUDGES IF YOU DON'T LIKE WHAT YOU SEE!
OH! I clearly remember!

You agree JMM NEVER LOST ANY SINGLE FIGHT IN HIS CAREER! All his lost is due to the ref:!::|

This is Truly laughable :rofl

if you like the results the judges are not corrupt
if you don't like the results the judges are corrupt.

that easy!

 

i am giving you an easier time to look at the window and examine what

happened in this fight.. all the complaining that jmm got robbed, pac got

the gift and your crying for a third fight .. this fight was so close that it

could go either way. but heck, your boy couldnt keep his feet on the ground

not only once but twice and held on that rope for dear life. so please.....

that 10-7 should convince those doubters and those who said that this

fight was close and could go either way that pac got short changed on

the scoring just like the first fight....

you said jmm got robbed... i say pac got short-changed in the scoring...
it goes around :hi::hi::hi:

 

pretty much agree with you mate,
btw no offense meant, my post
really are for the crybabies and
based on your post youre not one of them

 

divac did not complain when one judge admitted he made a mistake on the first fight. the mistake favored jmm. judges are not corrupt! :hi:

had the story been on jmm's side. **** the judges! they are corrupt! :dead

 

You must be the most depressed man ever to grace ESB then. You average about 20 emoticons per post. :yep

 

So far three or four of us have put up our scorecards in this thread.

None of those can agree on the score or most of the rounds.

It was a close fight, with valid reasons for each fighter winning.

Pacquiao got the decision by a point.

No-one got owned or humiliated. Both lots of supporters should revel in a bloody good fight.

 

Exactly! If only everyone could appreciate their own fighters without necessarily discrediting the others, we might live in peace and harmony.
Nay, we are on ESB so thats not possible lols

 

:good

conflict is good. if there is no conflict, these boxers would not be as rich as they are now. records would show that pac won the fight. that is all there is to it.

 

Where in this thread have I said that JMM got robbed.....the only thing I've said in this thread is that you *******s are still working on convincing YOURSELVES that it was'nt a robbery.

I've never made a mention of my opinion of the fight, its already been debated to nauseam in this forum.......


.....and btw, get your facts straight......I'm probably one of the few who is not calling for a 3rd JMM-Pac fight.....I've explained myself clearly on this matter in other threads.......

We've already seen these two go at it twice, and nothing I've seen from either of them since convinces me that anything changes in a 3rd match........

The fight that will happen on July 18th, is the fight I want to see......a true Superfight between two elitely skilled fighters with very little weaknesses.

Two SUPER FIGHTERS.......A TRUE SUPERFIGHT!!!:deal

 

FINALLY a SUPERFIGHT for JMM. After all these years JMM can finally talk about something to elevate his status other than talking about pac and pac and pac all over again.

Hopefully something TRULY INTERESTING in JMM's RESUME if he wins!
Coz currently JMM's resume is miles and miles inferior than pac.

Hard to swallow but true! Truth hurts divac!

Anyway, I like JMM to win when he fights pbf. But pls pls pls don't be a cry baby again and say it's the judges fault if you don't like the results.

After all, in your mind, JMM NEVER NEVER NEVER LOST any fight at all
correct?!