Ok then. I see you scored a lot of rounds to Williams because he was busier. To me that's how you score an amateur-fight. Lara landed the harder, cleaner and more meaningful shots in most of the rounds. And if busier means landing more Lara was busier than Williams because he landed more over all. Of course that doesn't tell the whole truth as you score on a round per round basis.
Yeah, eventful fight although a bit too one-sided, but you can witness a brilliant Lara finding through Williams' guard over and over again. If you like PDub however I don't recommend it, he takes a lot of punishment and looks over the hill. To thread start: we score for clean effective punching not for volume and utter bullcrap called 'ring generalship' if such thing actually exists. Lara clearly did the effective work in almost every round, you could give Williams however 3 or 4 when his volume was paired with some nice connects. But 4 rounds at best. Lara was the better in the hit and not get hit department in the rest.
I've watched it twice trying to give Williams the benefit of the doubt, still have the same card - 9-3 Lara.
8-4 Lara...I suppose if your TRYING to give rounds to Paul, you could find two rounds to give to him to make it 6-6 (draw)..Paul won a couple early rounds, and one of the later ones, none of the middle rounds. It's not this one sided blowout that people are making it seem to be, it was a competitive fight with a clear winner (Lara).
How many meaningful punches did Williams land in the whole fight? I'm struggling to think of more than 3.
I'm a PWill fan but I gave the fight to Lara 7-5. I'm a Huge Holyfield fan but scored it 8-4 Lewis in their first encounter. Most of those rounds were close. Also, scoring it 11- 1 or 12-0 for Lara is just as wrong.