Wawrzyk will face Stiverne, Washington or Breazeale on Jan 16th

Well there goes Wawrzyks chance at a big payday against Wilder.

 

Source? I couldn't find anything about this. Thanks

 

:thumbsup

Wawrzyk is absolutely horrible, worse than Molina or Duhaupas. He was terrified against Povetkin, his punch stats from that fight:

Round One: Jab 2/11, Power 0/4
Round Two: Jab: 3/9, Power: 0/2
Round Three: KTFO

 

Well Stiverne is definitely on the card, so maybe its him

 

Why not add them all?

Stiverne vs Wawrzyk
Breazeale vs Washington

It'd be cool

 

:deal

Wawrzyk is awful

 

The main worry here is that using Wawrzyk and Stiverne as an undercard fight could possibly be groundwork for a future clash between the winner of this fight and Wilder...hope not.

But my suspicions come from the fact that Wawrzyk is pretty much unknown outside of Europe, so to bring him over to the US to fight on the undercard is pretty conspicuous.

 

Where are all the "Wawrzyk is going to fight Wilder" theorists? You know who you are.

Still lol at the fact that there are actually posters on this forum who continually criticized Wilder for "defending against Wawrzyk" -- which never happened, and which wasn't ever signed or anything but a figment of their own imaginations -- yet they nut-hug on Sasha Povetkin ... who actually DID defend a world title against the same guy.

It's mind-boggling.

I think some of them are scared that he's going to beat Stiverne or Washington or Breazeale, making them look ridiculous.

 

It's pretty clear that Gaymon and company were trying to get that up for a while. Lol at you denying reality, just because things have changed and Wilder can't fight Wawrzyk at the moment doesn't mean they weren't trying to set it up previously.

And Povetkin defended the lightly regarded WBA-regular title, a bogus bull**** belt. Even then Povetkin defended against guys like Huck, and Chagaev. Lol at delusional windmill fanboys like you trying to be clever.

What if Wawrzyk beats those guys??? I'm sure you'd want that wouldn't you? If he did it would make the WBC belt look like even more of a joke, that's what it would do.

 

Wilder fought freaking Eric Molina who's probably even worse than Wawrzyk. Wilder was in talks with 45 year old Shannon Briggs before opting for a Jennings left-over. I fail to see how anyone can defend this dude's opposition. He fights Molina, Adonis fights Karpency. It's hard to figure out whether they are WBC world champions or Ohio state champions.

 

13-0 Parker more or less had a fight with Molina before newly crowned 33-0 WBC champion Wilder plucked him from them

That says it all. Wilder is a disgrace to the sport.

 

No, it's pretty clear that you wanted to make it seem as if there was going to be a Wilder-Wawrzyk fight. But there was never, at any point, any chance that was happening.

You made it up. Your "evidence" was that Wawrzyk fought on Wilder's undercard. ... That's it. Just that. (Never mind that he, like Wilder, is a Haymon fighter, so it makes sense that they might end up on the same card.)

And your boy Sasha Povetkin DID NOT defend his title against Chagaev. He fought Chaga for the vacant WBA "regular" title.

His four title defenses were: 42-year-old Cedric Boswell, who was about as deserving as Cedric the Entertainer (though less relevant), Marco "Cruiser" Huck (who damned near beat Sasha), 43-year-old Hasim Rahman and the guy who Wilder has never fought, nor contracted to fight, nor been reported to have signed to fight ... WAWRZYK.

Those are Povetkin's four title fights in the span of 26 months between beating Chaga and losing (badly, embarrassingly so) to Klitschko.

This will be Wilder's fourth title fight in the span of less than one year. Not one of his opponents has been over 40 years old (two of Sasha's were), none of them are cruiserweights (one of Povetkin's was) and NONE OF THEM ARE WAWRZYK (Povetkin is the one who sought him out as a title challenger).

Your only defense for Sasha's shameful string of title challengers is that, well, it's not even really a world title, it's only the WBA regular title. That should have made him want to bolster the belt up by fighting real opposition ... yet he used it instead to fight shot old men and cruiserweights and your boy Wawrzyk.

You made a statement a few months ago that there were 30 heavyweights out there who would knock Wilder out. I challenged you to list them. You didn't.

So put up or shut up.

 

Ok you caught me on the Chagaev being for the vacant WBA-regular belt, I forgot that... Still a better fight than Wilder/Stiverne was, for a bogus title that's not even recognized by most boxing fans!

Huck is still much better than any defense Wilders had, and Boswell even at that age isn't really any worse than Molina or Duhaupas. Difference was Povetkin was defending a bogus, BULL**** belt. Not the WBC world title. Wlad was the real WBA-champion really after he beat Chagaev, but not officially until he beat Haye.

As for the 30 guys who would beat Wilder... Link me to that. If I said that I would have responded. Today I think there's quite a few heavyweights i'd favor heavily against Wilder, and those who i'd really like against them. IDK about 30 though, he has improved a little bit. I will give him that much.