WBA at it again

Discussion in 'British Boxing Forum' started by robpalmer135, Mar 5, 2010.


  1. Boro chris

    Boro chris Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,275
    21
    Mar 14, 2005
    A lot of these extra divisions need to go especially the lower weights. Too easy for boxers to make a career without fighting the toughest guys. In fact its down right bad business sense to take a challenge. Look at Arum trying stop Hasegawa/Montiel. He's allready scuppered Gamboa/Lopez.

    There are some decent divisions not of the original eight however. Should super middle be done away with?
    I think a much bigger problem are the alphabet boys who pretend they're boxing administrators when infact they're nothing more than parasites.

    Edit: Also 24 hours weigh are an important factor nowadays. Can you imagine aguy who is only just too big for lightweight haveing to jump up all the way to welter and take on the bloody huge Clotey?
     
  2. Flea Man

    Flea Man มวยสากล

    82,426
    1,478
    Sep 7, 2008
    agree, 24 hour weigh ins do more damage than same day IMO
     
  3. robpalmer135

    robpalmer135 Obsessed with Boxing banned

    28,342
    0
    Jun 29, 2007
    anyone see what Mayweather said when Mosley told him he had the belt and that he was champion.

    Maywether rippied him and said the belt means nothing and he wont pay a sanctioning fee. good on him
     
  4. loughlan

    loughlan Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,896
    0
    Feb 9, 2010

    Bernard Dunne's win over Cordoba meant more than Khan's win over Kotelnik and many other "world title" winners of late.Fighters make belts,belts don't make fighters.
     
  5. Actually poorly paid chinese children in sweat shops make belts.

    That's why they've become more easily available and less valuable.
     
  6. loughlan

    loughlan Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,896
    0
    Feb 9, 2010

    :lol:
     
  7. NO MAS

    NO MAS Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,784
    1
    Mar 2, 2009
    8 Weights, 8 Belts and same day weigh-ins...:good
     
  8. hagman1989

    hagman1989 the boxing site , try it Full Member

    8,284
    1
    Dec 13, 2008
    only two sanctioning bodies per division wth one belt with each

    scrap some of the wights and reajust the weight limits in some of the divisions
     
  9. nip102

    nip102 Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,225
    1
    Aug 13, 2009
    the sanction bodies are a useful evil.Johnson wouldn't have got a shot against rjj if it was for his belt and the allow fighters without the right connections like cab to make a living.It would be far easier for casuals if there were 4 titlists and 1 champ.I use to think the ring belt was the way to go but i now think its approach is to half arsed.Does anyone know why the japs only have two sanctioning bodies
    The weightin thing is tricky some dumbass still cut alot with same days
     
  10. GazOC

    GazOC Guest Star for Team Taff Full Member

    61,460
    42
    Jan 7, 2005

    Yeah, the way things are theres no other option these days.
     
  11. RichT

    RichT Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,907
    0
    Oct 17, 2009
    I've got to the stage where I hope the sanctioning bodies go even further and **** things up more. As things stand nothing will be done about the ridiculous number of belts etc. but if they keep going and make it even worse there will be a time when people will have enough and the sanctioning bodies (or at least some of them) will be tossed aside as worthless and some clarity will be restored to the sport.

    Can't see anyway it gets better without getting worse first.
     
  12. threethirteen

    threethirteen Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,366
    1
    Jan 24, 2009
    Is there ever a day when you aren't sucking Mayweather's ****?

    The only reason he cares now is cause he doesn't have the belt. He's made a massive issue out of beating Baldomir for the 'linear' belts rather than fighting the best at the weight at the time.

    He can't have it both ways.
     
  13. Raashid

    Raashid Member Full Member

    476
    0
    Oct 9, 2007
    I remember reading that back in the 70s or 80s The Ring magazine got caught accepting bribes from a promoter to fiddle their rankings, may have been Don King and as a result their credibility was shot. As a result, the TV companies had to start giving credence to the alphabet bodies as up till then they didn't really carry any weight. But of course then the alphabet bodies were as susceptible to promoter influence as well.
    I think John McCain had an interest in claening up boxing. There was an idea mooted that all alphabet bodies would be barred from the US. Without the TV revenue, no decent fighters would be willing to use them and they would eventually die an natural death. I think the US government didn't want a federal administration of boxing tho.
     
  14. Flea Man

    Flea Man มวยสากล

    82,426
    1,478
    Sep 7, 2008
    Yeah, Floyd gloated about his numerous WBC belts, which actually led him to inferior opposition other than more dangerous belt holders.

    Floyd is a perfect example of numerous weights/belts making someone look better than they are, allowing someone to achieve with an unimpressive resume.
     
  15. achillesthegreat

    achillesthegreat FORTUNE FAVOURS THE BRAVE Full Member

    37,070
    29
    Jul 21, 2004
    It's disgusting, it really is. There should be 1 champ. Interim champs should be in VERY rare cases.