WBA regular champs or chumps ???

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by swilson120, Jul 7, 2009.


  1. swilson120

    swilson120 Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,009
    0
    May 6, 2009
    Does the fact that the WBA install a "super champ" if one of the titlists owns one of the other belts and then has their other top ranking contenders fight for the "regular" title lessen their champion status ??
     
    swilson120, Jul 7, 2009
    swilson120, Jul 7, 2009
    #1
  2. Sarah

    Sarah Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,552
    0
    Feb 18, 2009
    Yes it does.

    I ****ing hate the WBA
     
    Sarah, Jul 7, 2009
    Sarah, Jul 7, 2009
    #2
  3. swilson120

    swilson120 Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,009
    0
    May 6, 2009
    ha ha give me an example of some of the regular chumps ??
     
    swilson120, Jul 7, 2009
    swilson120, Jul 7, 2009
    #3
  4. Rebel 08

    Rebel 08 Member Full Member

    404
    0
    Apr 1, 2008
    Bernard Dunne at superbantam.this system is a joke and only another way for the WBA to charge more money from the fighters.
     
    Rebel 08, Jul 7, 2009
    Rebel 08, Jul 7, 2009
    #4
  5. swilson120

    swilson120 Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,009
    0
    May 6, 2009
    yeah well anthony mundine is the example for mine claims to be a two time super middleweight champ and has never won defeating a champion !!!
     
    swilson120, Jul 7, 2009
    swilson120, Jul 7, 2009
    #5
  6. Boom_Boom

    Boom_Boom R.I.P Boxing 6/9/12 Full Member

    38,291
    23
    Sep 21, 2006
    does the wba still collect sanctioning fees for the super champion, regular champion and interim champion's fights?
     
    Boom_Boom, Jul 7, 2009
    Boom_Boom, Jul 7, 2009
    #6