WBA trying to **** over Golovkin

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Wiirdo, Sep 6, 2010.


  1. lefthook89

    lefthook89 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    7,569
    82
    Sep 28, 2009

    I have actually, way ahead of you:good. and on damn near every article it says the same thing, instead of pushing for a sturm-golovkin matchup (sturm is considered the wba super champ), they're instead pushing for a fight between the #3 fighter and #4 ranked fighter. absolutely no source indicates golovkins team has tried to reach for negotiations with n'dams team. while yes n'dam has to fight the interim champ (golovkin) first, there is still nothing on anyone ducking eachother. so please, hop off golovkins nuts and hop back into reality.
     
  2. Escopeta

    Escopeta Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,131
    8
    Apr 12, 2010
    you still dont know ****.. try again.
     
  3. brickfists

    brickfists The Nonpareil Full Member

    8,666
    7
    Nov 19, 2008
    i read this **** earlier its a ****in joke but i dont think it will happen according to the wba own rules the fight has to be offered to golovkin first which it clearly wasnt so it wont happen

    golovkin would hav a solid court case against if it did
     
  4. Kelly green

    Kelly green Active Member Full Member

    1,165
    0
    Jan 19, 2010
    Golovkin hasnt done **** in the pros yet he deserves to get a shot at a world title?
    Im not a big fan of pavlik but he had to walk through fire (Edison mirandas power) in order to get a shot and thats the way it should be.
     
  5. lefthook89

    lefthook89 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    7,569
    82
    Sep 28, 2009
    oh wow what a witty, well thought out retort!! ive got nothing on this fool-proof world class response!:nut
     
  6. Hozumi's Hook

    Hozumi's Hook WHO NECKS!?!? Full Member

    6,396
    1
    Aug 4, 2009
    Ye hes done nothing except being obviously one of the top 3 middleweights in the world. Use your eyes.
     
  7. Kelly green

    Kelly green Active Member Full Member

    1,165
    0
    Jan 19, 2010
    Yes he looks great beating poor opposition like Daivd Lemieux. One top 10 ranked guy at least ffs.
     
  8. Hozumi's Hook

    Hozumi's Hook WHO NECKS!?!? Full Member

    6,396
    1
    Aug 4, 2009
    :patsch

    He deservbes a shot more than most based on ability.

    MW is a very young division now and hes more proven than the majority of others who would also be in contetion. Yes it is by default (slightly) but he deserves his shot; but thats not his fault and he's a hell of a good fighter.
     
  9. NoHomeJerome

    NoHomeJerome Boxing Junkie banned

    8,229
    0
    Feb 14, 2010
    The hell are you talking about?
     
  10. Doc (aka Meke)

    Doc (aka Meke) Active Member Full Member

    1,369
    5
    Oct 19, 2007
    Of course they will have three different champs! It means they can get money from three different bouts... it makes perfect sense and I'd do the same if I were WBA! :lol:
     
  11. Kelly green

    Kelly green Active Member Full Member

    1,165
    0
    Jan 19, 2010
    I mean both Golovkin and Lemieux have beat nobody but the children on here think they deserve the world title shot because the think they deserve it?
    Who have they beat?
     
  12. Kelly green

    Kelly green Active Member Full Member

    1,165
    0
    Jan 19, 2010
    Golovkin hasnt beat nobody near close to world level.
     
  13. Hozumi's Hook

    Hozumi's Hook WHO NECKS!?!? Full Member

    6,396
    1
    Aug 4, 2009
    I'm not going to answer you because you have either missed my point or canty answer it because I'm completely correct and you just dont really like Golovkin.

    Who at MW deserves a shot at one of the belts more than him?
     
  14. Hozumi's Hook

    Hozumi's Hook WHO NECKS!?!? Full Member

    6,396
    1
    Aug 4, 2009
    *Kelly green is currently searching boxrec right now*
     
  15. Kelly green

    Kelly green Active Member Full Member

    1,165
    0
    Jan 19, 2010
    I love watching Golovkin but he hasnt beaten no one.