WBC confirms Errol Spence will face Danny Garcia next

You trying to hard with the "smaller" Garcia

Garcia is about 5'7-5'8 and has already accumulated to 147 spence isnt much bigger than danny

You are trying to hard by the way with the hate . Try something more logical. You shot yourself in the foot with this posts

 

By the way why do you bring up Thurman? Spence only wanted thurman because of that belt he had. Spence is after the belts according to himself

So Thurman dosent make sense

Crawford and Pacquiao makes sense .

 

2 wins and 2 losses in last 4 fights. "Isn't bad?" BHAHAHAHAHAHA

 

I think that it will be a terrific bout, Errol Spence vs Danny Swift Garcia, looking forward to it. Garcia has a real good chance in this one, if he works hard in training camp, comes in focused, and in the ring, applies enormous pressure on Spence. That tactic bothered Errol in his fight with Porter. And it is possible Spence has too many out of the ring distractions, at fight time.

 

"Let's see if the WBC confirms that Spence will ever walk again first." CLICKS LINK. "A broken tooth? You're shitting me."

 

To you it is ridiculous, to me it isn't. I understand your point. For me, I take into consideration this medium and technology overall allows us to micromanage a fighter's win.

Again, countless, hundred of fighters fought through pain, dilemma, family f-up affairs, from Cleveland Williams to Vinny Pazienza=accidents. Hell Ann Wolfe a female won several belts after she had surgery on both rotators, had pregnancies, but those aren't reasons for me to catapult her- because of what bad happened outside the ring.

To me it is border line ridiculous to give praise to fighters who cry about their injuries, accidents and alcohol & drug abuse. (Think Fury). But we don't always hear those whose tough fights resulted from injury. To this day the sorriest outside the ring figure (Floyd) never talked about his hand injury leading up to Castillo one. Fans talk it, but he didn't. So I would have to credit Floyd Castillo I & II all the more...IF I am to credit Thurman for a long layoff, regardless of why.
Point being, injuries, bad luck in life isn't a reason for me to lift a fighter over another.

And I think his fight was a dangerous affair against Porter, I agree. But this website overall doesn't. They rag him call him a sloppy fighter, can't stand to watch his style. So to the masses it wasn't dangerous, to you and I? Yup it was.

 

LOL! Yup, sometimes I can say a fighter who lost 3x in a row, put up a better showing than someone who won their last 2,3 or 4.

It's not the loss, it's who you lost to and how. & it's not winning, its who you beat.
My point is simple: Spence taking this fight it isn't a bad choice. But hold me accountable man!! for also saying: It isn't the best choice either!

 

Great post overall. But to quote your last comment regarding idiots on the site, I'd rather not give simpletons too much attention. Crawford is getting too much hype at the moment, and rightfully so, that usually bothers the majority. Whoever he fights will be considered a "joke".

 

Its just Business, PBC business. In house money generation. It's just a date filler. Former world champ vs current in a relatively entertaining bout which ultimately will only have one result. A win for Spence. The A-side.

 

That's not funny

 

I'm fine with this fight. Garcia still hasn't really done much of note at 147 but he was competitive with Thurman and Porter so that's something. Hopefully Spence can stop him so Garcia's annoying father can shut the **** up about his son being robbed on the cards.

 

Garcia hits much harder than either Thurman or Porter .