WBC dodged "demise" bullet (good or bad?)

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Longhhorn71, Jun 19, 2008.


  1. Longhhorn71

    Longhhorn71 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,714
    3,455
    Jan 6, 2007
    In 1998, Roy Jones Jr. gives up WBC lightheavy title. German contender
    This content is protected
    and former champion
    This content is protected
    fight to fill the vacancy, sanctioning it as a world championship match and Rocchigiani wins.

    Jones then says "whoa momma" and wants to be re-instated. WBC tells
    Rocchigiani that it was a "typo" in their rankings saying Rocchigiani was
    their lightheavy champ.

    Rocchigiani immediately filed a lawsuit against the WBC in a
    This content is protected
    , claiming that the organization's actions both were contrary to their own rules and injurious to his earning potential (due to diminished professional stature). On
    This content is protected
    ,
    This content is protected
    , the judge ruled in Rocchigiani's favor, awarding him $30 million (U.S.) in damages and reinstating him as a former WBC Champion (Rocchigiani had lost a bout since his WBC Title match).
    The following day, the WBC sought protection by filing for Chapter 11
    This content is protected
    (i.e., corporate debt restructuring) in
    This content is protected
    . The organization then spent the next 13 months attempting to negotiate a six-figure settlement with Rocchigiani, but Rocchigiani did not at first accept.
    On
    This content is protected
    ,
    This content is protected
    , the WBC announced it would enter Chapter 7 bankruptcy liquidation (i.e., business closing and total asset sell-off) proceedings, effectively ending its existence. This action prompted some in the boxing community to plead with Rocchigiani to settle the dispute, which he did in mid-July
    This content is protected
    .

    Would it have best for the WBC to have bit the dust???????
     
  2. Maxmomer

    Maxmomer Boxing Addict Full Member

    7,373
    42
    Jun 28, 2007
  3. Pat_Lowe

    Pat_Lowe Active Member Full Member

    1,194
    15
    Feb 26, 2006
    Good for us as boxing fans, but bad for the many boxers out there who held some sort of variation of a WBC title. Holding a title entitles a boxer to more income. Also the WBC along with the WBA are the 2 most historically significant titles.

    On a separate note, the majority of boxing fans whinge about the sanctioning bodies and how they are bring down the sport. Yet lately they seem to recognise and acknowledge the WBO as a legitimate title. Its pretty bull**** if you ask me. Its only really happened in the last 3 or 4 years and I believe alot of it can be traced to Lamon Brewster holding it at heavyweight when a large proportion of the boxing world was looking for a heavyweight champion. He appeared to be the best of the lot and was bestowed alot of status and in turn the WBO gained recognition. Its a ridiculous title and I am strongly against it gaining stature
     
  4. TBooze

    TBooze Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    25,495
    2,148
    Oct 22, 2006
    The truth is people are stupid, they need Senor Suliman to tell them who is in his opinion the best fighter in a weight division is.
     
  5. sp6r=underrated

    sp6r=underrated Member Full Member

    295
    0
    Jun 7, 2008
    Its the hypocrisy of boxing fans. Boxing fans want their favorite fighter to be a champion, even if he hasn't earned that status in the ring. As a result, boxing fans well elevate any sanctioning body that recognizes their favorite fighter as a champion.
     
  6. BIG DEE

    BIG DEE Active Member Full Member

    522
    5
    Dec 7, 2007
    Big Dee Here= Would Have Been Great For Boxing To Get The Hell Rid Of Those Assholes.