****! Here we go with the goddam "Champ emeritus" again. I can understand Vitali being given the recognition because he went to forced retirement due to an injury while still holder a belt . . . but Pac? :yikes What is wrong with ****i'n Sulaiman? :fire :huh
Doesn't make any sense......he is the best at 130, but I thought you had to hold a belt to bestowed that?
I know that's why I'm still pondering rightnow how this could be justified. Does it mean that . . . WBC is giving Pac all the time to decide when he wants to fight for the belt? :nut :huh :rofl :rofl :rofl :rofl
they're just sweetening the pot to prod pac to take the match against jmm so the wbc could show that the best superfeatherweight in the world holds their belt which is the winnver of pac-jmm of course. is the sanctioning fee for a champ emeritus more expensive than that of an international champion, if so, it makes perfect sense for the wbc to give him that
:yikes :yikes :yikes Oh yeah . . . now I know why the especial "awarding" of that "champ emeritus" ****. :rofl :rofl :rofl :rofl :rofl :rofl :rofl :rofl
