WBC Orders Lara-Martirosyan Eliminator

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by RJJFan, Jul 5, 2012.


Page 1 of 4
  1. RJJFan

    RJJFan Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    14,002
    6,964
    Sep 5, 2010
    WBC calls Lara-Martyrosian eliminator

    By Gabriel F. Cordero

    WBC executive secretary Mauricio Sulaiman informed Fightnews.com that the WBC has ordered free negotiations to commence for a final elimination bout between Erislandy Lara and Vanes Martyrosian to determine the mandatory challenger for current WBC super welterweight champion Mexican Saul “Canelo” Alvarez. If there is no agreemnet between the parties, a purse bid will be held on July 27 at WBC Headquarters in Mexico City. “Both boxers have claimed in the media and in public their desire for a world title shot. Now the WBC has made an official decision. Now we’re waiting for the promoters to do the fight. It`s a great fight and we think it’s not a problem to do this fight,” said Sulaiman.


    ========================================================

    ....to be followed up with the Final Final Eliminator, then the Super Duper Final Eliminator, and then the.....:patsch.

    Good fight though, I'd love to see it.
     
    RJJFan, Jul 5, 2012
    RJJFan, Jul 5, 2012
    #1
  2. Sir Will Wigan

    Sir Will Wigan HLF: A Real "Fightin' Man" Full Member

    3,936
    415
    Jan 16, 2011
    I'll be looking forward to this one.
     
    Sir Will Wigan, Jul 5, 2012
    Sir Will Wigan, Jul 5, 2012
    #2
  3. daprofessor

    daprofessor da legendary professor Full Member

    12,240
    14
    Sep 1, 2007
    vanes is going to pull out....or get beat.
     
    daprofessor, Jul 5, 2012
    daprofessor, Jul 5, 2012
    #3
  4. saul_ir34

    saul_ir34 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,549
    0
    May 6, 2007
    This was already ordered a long time ago but Vanes was scared and said no. He wants to keep his "perfect" record.
     
    saul_ir34, Jul 5, 2012
    saul_ir34, Jul 5, 2012
    #4
  5. Hatesrats

    Hatesrats "I'm NOT Suprised..." Full Member

    60,376
    241
    Sep 28, 2007
    Nice, I made a comment about it in the "Why Cuban fighters... Thread"
    Sweet you confirmed it.

    Good scrap, this is what was needed for both guys.
    Now GB has no excuse to fight the winner.
     
    Hatesrats, Jul 5, 2012
    Hatesrats, Jul 5, 2012
    #5
  6. Hermit

    Hermit Loyal Member banned

    44,341
    3
    Jan 29, 2008
    Vanes said he wants "in writing" that he gets a guaranteed shot at Canelo as he has already fought an eliminator that is already being ignored as the WBC continues to provide cover for Canelo.
     
    Hermit, Jul 5, 2012
    Hermit, Jul 5, 2012
    #6
  7. RJJFan

    RJJFan Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    14,002
    6,964
    Sep 5, 2010
    The ACTUAL reason was that Vanes and TR wanted a guarantee that the eliminator ensures a shot at Canelo. Apparently, We Be Crooks wouldn't guarantee it.
     
    RJJFan, Jul 5, 2012
    RJJFan, Jul 5, 2012
    #7
  8. JN43

    JN43 Guest

    vano better hurry up and fight someone, sick and tired of him crying constantly.
     
    JN43, Jul 5, 2012
    JN43, Jul 5, 2012
    #8
  9. purephase

    purephase Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,740
    89
    Jan 14, 2011
    Vanes claims he'll take this fight on twitter. How long do you guys give him before he changes his tune just like he always does? I expect Golden Boy will win the purse bid and all of the sudden money will again become a huge concern for Team Martirosyan.
     
    purephase, Jul 5, 2012
    purephase, Jul 5, 2012
    #9
  10. Hermit

    Hermit Loyal Member banned

    44,341
    3
    Jan 29, 2008
    Look how long it has taken Martinez to enforce his mandatory status on Jr. WBC. We Be Covering for our own.
     
    Hermit, Jul 5, 2012
    Hermit, Jul 5, 2012
    #10
  11. Hatesrats

    Hatesrats "I'm NOT Suprised..." Full Member

    60,376
    241
    Sep 28, 2007
    He must have realized the division was passing him by...
    Vanes already made some comments about it on his twitter.
    (now lets see he don't get "Ortiz'd" on sat)
     
    Hatesrats, Jul 5, 2012
    Hatesrats, Jul 5, 2012
    #11
  12. RJJFan

    RJJFan Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    14,002
    6,964
    Sep 5, 2010
    As long as the "Final" eliminator winners are not guaranteed a shot at the champion, GB have plenty of excuses not to fight the winner.
     
    RJJFan, Jul 5, 2012
    RJJFan, Jul 5, 2012
    #12
  13. purephase

    purephase Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,740
    89
    Jan 14, 2011
    Vanes NEVER fought a final title eliminator. He wasn't misled or lied to in that instance, he was simply being a crybaby like always.
     
    purephase, Jul 5, 2012
    purephase, Jul 5, 2012
    #13
  14. Tyler-Durden

    Tyler-Durden Boxing Junkie banned

    11,190
    1
    Mar 24, 2010
    Vanes already proved several times that he's a puto, he'll find a way to escape ... again !
     
    Tyler-Durden, Jul 5, 2012
    Tyler-Durden, Jul 5, 2012
    #14
  15. Hermit

    Hermit Loyal Member banned

    44,341
    3
    Jan 29, 2008
    Yeah, with the WBC they are never 'final'. Pavlik went through the same ****.
     
    Hermit, Jul 5, 2012
    Hermit, Jul 5, 2012
    #15
Page 1 of 4