WBC orders Vanes-Lara rematch

Well we need a winner, I understand why they're doing it.

 

I've heard you talk about this criteria a couple of times. I have a correction to make. A boxing match is judged on effective aggression,(not effective punching, if this were the case Hagler would be undefeated and Mayweather never would have defeated Baldomir) defense, ring generalship, clean punches.

 

Deserved it for headbutting the **** out of his opponent?

 

For sure and it made it much to easy for Lara to counter s he also came forward as he head hunted .

 

maybe ESPN2 FNF would air this, but that's about it.

 

So, everytime Harold repeats "with a strong empahsis on clean, effective punching" he is wrong?

 

Flip a ****in coin and call it good, no one needs to re-experience this **** fest.

 

Yea I don't need to see that again.

 

Lara was winnin that fight. It shouldn't have been a draw. Vanes is gonna have to let that cut heal. Why should Lara have to wait on that to get his shot? Just give Lara the next crack at Canelo.

 

Cuz that is the rules and he didn't earn **** with that disgusting performance of flagrant fouls. He didn't start winning until he took the wind out Vanes sails with that intentional low blow. You would reward him for that? :rofl

 

No for, MMA moves and low blow.

By the way, I had 5-4 for Lara, but he should have had 1-2 points deducted for dirty actions.

 

We all know what Lederman means, but techically, he is wrong.

 

:deal