WBC Prez Sulaiman on Canelo/Cotto rematch clause and GGG

lol Cotto never ducked anyone during his hayday at WW and JrWW. But going up to JrMW and now being MW champion, he sure is a diva when it comes to who he fights.

 

:huhUmmm, We Be Crooks(W.B.C.):
We Love Men(W.L.M.)?:huh

 

Marlon Brando was good at acting, hence acting like a man. As for the two pagans you mentioned, it was pretty much the norm for powerful men back then. You did forget to mention however that powerful men in Rome were not supposed to be "receivers" as Julius Caesar was once accused of being. Also in my opinion the "manliest" most bad ass bi***ual was a man who didn't care if he was going to (hell unlike the heathens you mentioned he was a Christian who believed he might go to hell for his sins), a king of England known as Richard The Lion Heart.

 

Maybe. Alexander inherited his dad's kingdom/empire and always had an army. Cotto and every other boxer faces their enemy alone. Women have been in power and waged war before does that make them manly? Was Golda Meyer (spelling) manly by your definition?

 

Well, I've heard people call Gandhi a sissy and womanly so I guess your line of thinking isn't that far off.

 

**** me this thread is weird.... Either way good to know.

 

Like it matters

And the Cotto comment is hilarious! Of all the people atsch

 

What I don't get is why it's alright to say that about Gandhi but not Jesus. Oh well...

 

How so? Jesus couldn't liberate Palestine and had to get all of his high disciples to make up stories about him being a zombie for people to remember him. Gandhi did liberate India and nobody had to pretend he was supernatural to do it.