WBC rejects Alvarez vs. Trout

WBC are a bunch of salty ****s.

 

That they are. Would of been a decent unification bout where Alvarez would of had a chance to avenge his brothers loss.

 

wbc dont reognise the "regular title" and tbh it is a farce, i think they only recognize cottos one.

 

WBC: We Be Crooks.

 

of course they reject it. suilaiman doesn't want a black dude beating their mexican hype job.

 

What happen to the days of unification and record breaking title defenses?

 

Trout fought so defensively in his last fight i knew this fight would be hard to sell

 

lol at trout beating anyone decent,

 

Him and rodriguez stunk up the joint,had me dozing off.

 

This would not be a unification bout, because Trout is not a real champion. That being said, it's ridiculous that the WBC would reject this fight.

 

i'm happy about this. **** that matchup, bring on alvarez-rosado.

 

ASS COVER and nothing more. Trout wanted VADA testing so GBP ran to the WBC for cover. No words to adequately convey my feelings on this one. After all WBC has only ONE chump per division. :rofl

WTF does this even mean?
The WBC said Tuesday: “We do not accept unification, because if we agree we would be losing authority. We are not going to take away the exclusivity because we own the WBC brand.”

 

thwey reject Trout but mention Freitas as a possible opponent.... :rofl:rofl

 

The curse of Cinamon strikes again!