WBO orders Saunders to fight back to back mandatories

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by tommyg6, Oct 24, 2016.


  1. tommyg6

    tommyg6 Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,395
    1,520
    May 30, 2015
  2. Robney

    Robney ᴻᴼ ᴸᴼᴻᴳᴲᴿ ᴲ۷ᴵᴸ Full Member

    93,188
    27,906
    Jan 18, 2010
    If the WBO does that, then I'm almost certain that Canelo is getting Khurtsidze's position.
    Recent press releases from the WBO already made it clear that they really like to see Saunders vs Alvarez, and with that the money that comes with it. So a clear case of going for the money over what's right, while masking it as forcing the rules upon their beltholder.
     
  3. tommyg6

    tommyg6 Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,395
    1,520
    May 30, 2015
    As long as that UK bum Saunders loses his belt, I'm fine with it. The dude is hanging onto that belt for dear life.
     
  4. Robney

    Robney ᴻᴼ ᴸᴼᴻᴳᴲᴿ ᴲ۷ᴵᴸ Full Member

    93,188
    27,906
    Jan 18, 2010
    But what do you think happens as Canelo gets his greedy mitts on the belt? K2 will need a top level hostage negotiator to even get the belt out within a year, and need to honor most of the Mexican cartel's insane demands too.
     
  5. Selina

    Selina Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,847
    187
    Sep 6, 2014
    It seems WBO and Frank Warren are good mates indeed. They are doing anything to block unification fight. Saunders seemed a real fighter before he won the belt, after Lee fight he has act like p....