WBO President: "If a fight is within the limit, it has to be for the title"

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by BigReg, Aug 5, 2009.


  1. rjamesd1

    rjamesd1 Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,884
    0
    Nov 4, 2007
    The COTTO/CLOTTEY fight shouldn't have a been a title fight because COTTO only weighed 146, which is 1 puound short of 147. HOw come nobody complained? :hat
     
  2. Sister Sledge

    Sister Sledge Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    18,129
    27
    Jul 24, 2004
    There is nothing in anyone's rulebook that say's a fighter has to defend his title everytime within his weight division. If Shane was fighting Lovemore N'Dou, would it be a title fight? Hell no. Pac is not even a WW contender.
     
  3. rjamesd1

    rjamesd1 Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,884
    0
    Nov 4, 2007
    Actually he's not suppose to be entitled to that Welter weight title because he weighs between 154-160 on fight night, He should be a MIDDLEWEIGHT! Something really needs to be done regarding weights of fighters, because the supposed to be DIVISION LIMITS aren't being followed. 141-147 should be the weight come fight night! Anything above that, is disqualification! :hat
     
  4. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    111,936
    45,804
    Mar 21, 2007
    A ****ing vaguely difficult problem like this really exposes the mongs on the site.
     
  5. BigReg

    BigReg Broad Street Bully Full Member

    38,117
    5
    Jun 26, 2007
    David, we're both saying the same thing here. If you go back my original reply to you, I specifiaclly stated that WBO champs need approval to fight a non title fight. I never said that the title always has to be on the line. However, the WBO can force champs can force champs to denfend if they fight within the division in which they are the champ. All the WBO has to do is deny permission and the champ would have to defend. Given that the president of the WBO has stated that he wants champs to defend if they fight within the division, it appears that Cotto is not going to get permission to fight a non title. Fight against Pac. So part B is very much relevant. Are we on the same page now?
     
  6. istmeno

    istmeno Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,664
    5
    Oct 6, 2006
    reg the confusion is in the language. they refer to non championship fights not non title. when they say championship, they refer to 12 round fights. that is fights slated at the championship distance.

    if they had signed this fight for 10 rounds, or 148, the wbo would have had no say in the matter.
     
  7. BigReg

    BigReg Broad Street Bully Full Member

    38,117
    5
    Jun 26, 2007
    This is what I'm talking about. You clearly made this up. I know you did because I've read the WBC rules and they clearly state that WBC champs must defend if they fight within the division.
     
  8. trlp1712

    trlp1712 Member Full Member

    144
    0
    Aug 1, 2009
    i hate all these stupid threads... seriously, over a zillion threads and a bazillion posts and people are still arguing about this?
     
  9. BigReg

    BigReg Broad Street Bully Full Member

    38,117
    5
    Jun 26, 2007
    Non title and non championship is basically the same thing. The WBO gives themselves wiggle room so they could possibly allow the champ to fight a 10 rounder(which obviously would be a non title fight). However, they have a say in any fight in which their champ participates.
     
  10. Thinman

    Thinman Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,474
    3
    Aug 12, 2005
    I am not an expert on this, but these are my 2 Cents.

    The weight (fighting within the limit) is not the main reason why this fight is going to be a title fight..... the main reason is because Cotto did not ask the WBO for the approval of his fight, prior to signing his contract with Pac....

    Even though the fight was originaly agreed as a non title fight, the WBO is taking advantage of the fact that (I thik this is what happend) Cotto made the mistake of signing a contract before getting the approval.... obviously the WBO wants this fight to be a title fight because it is convenient for them and Cotto cannot get out of the fight because of the contract.......

    If Cotto had not sign any contract (yet) then, he could go 'now' and ask the WBO for its approval, so he could fight a non title fight, of course he would have to pay the fees accordingly.....

    After getting the approval he would have signed the contract and then his title woudn't be on the line.... and if the WBO woudn't have approved his non title fight then Cotto would probably have vacated his title and then sign the contract with Pac..... of course if Pac's intentions was to fight a non-title fight....

    If Cotto doesn't fight Pac, then he would be sued by Pac, and if he fights then the WBO says 'the title will be on the line"......

    The only option for Cotto to fight without the title on the line would be if he vacates the title before he fights Pac.....

    My opinions is that Cotto was going to put the title on the line but he wanted to negotiate and get more money..... probably at the end he got some but no what he intended......

    The big question is: Why don't they (WBO) approve (now) the fight as a non-title fight????? Do you guys really believe that it is only because is within the limit????? I DON'T
     
  11. David_TheMan

    David_TheMan ESB Sage Full Member

    5,908
    2
    Dec 31, 2007
    I guess this is where we disagree, my reading of the rules lead me to understand that if the WBO denies permission for the bout and the WBO titleholder fights anyway without paying his fees he would be breaking one of the WBO bylaws, which states that the title will be stripped from said titleholder. So I understand what you are saying, I think we just have different takes on the consequences of what happens if Cotto goes against the WBO's wishes.

    I really don't understand the WBO's angle. It makes no sense to me that they would make Manny #1 contender over Clottey in their WW rankings, also if Manny wins he is just going to vacate the belt, so they still aren't going to get any more money except from Clottey if he fights for the vacant title. Seems to me they would get more money just keeping it with Cotto, atleast that way they still get their money for the Manny fight, and money from a mandatory Cotto fight, and any fight after that, assuming Clottey fights Shane instead of Cotto.
     
  12. Thinman

    Thinman Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,474
    3
    Aug 12, 2005
    The reason why they want this fight to be a title fight is because they are thinking in 'GLORY'...... 'REPUTATION'.....etc, etc, if Pac wins the fight.... at this point they don't care if Pac vacates the title after....

    If Cotto would be fighting 'John Smith' instead.... then this fight would have never been for the title.... Cotto would get the approval right away.....

    EDIT:

    Regarding Pac being ranked #1..... well, boxing is like that, isn't it.... the ABC organizations don't give a ****.... it is all about money..... money moves people in mysterious ways.... and it won't be the last time......
     
  13. theunderdog

    theunderdog Boxing Junkie Full Member

    7,814
    1
    Jul 4, 2006
    bob's paying. enough already
     
  14. paloalto00

    paloalto00 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,268
    5
    Mar 15, 2009
    You know nothing about boxing as I can tell. Most of boxers would go up a lot of weight classes if that were the case...
     
  15. psychopath

    psychopath D' "X" Factor Full Member

    26,390
    2
    Mar 13, 2007
    Fair enough. :D