Might be a bit late with this, just had the time off work to watch the fight (fragmented youtube videos granted) but why the probe and fuss about this decision? Pacquiao was hitting air most of the night (despite what the ******ed commentators would have you believe and as a judge quite rightly commented on).... this fight was a lot closer than JMM v Pac 3 which didn't get a "probe" into the decision, ridiculous example of the corruption in boxing most likely instigated by Arum. How can anyone possibly say the decision in this fight say as more controversial than Pac v JMM??
