WBO Reviewing Pacquiao-Bradley

Wrong. Even Max Kellerman said on the live HBO broadcast at the end of the fight that he had spoken to observers at ringside whose opinion he trusted and that some of them had the fight in Bradley's favour. He reiterated this again later toward the end of the broadcast and stated that this appeared to be largely from observers who were sat toward the position of Bradley's corner, mentioning that it is entirely possible that they saw the fight a different way from a different viewpoint.


This fight won't be over-turned. There is a case for was 6 - 5 Bradley with one round a draw and if anyone was paying off the judges for a gift it would be Arum who 'ordered' an investigation after immense pressure after initially stating there was no point almost immediately after the fight. That should tell you all you need to know.

It aint happening.

Timmeh!

 

and i'm telling you ive seen the same **** like this for 20 years and there is an outrage and after 2 weeks and other fights that take place, it becomes old news... ive seen protests of fights and the ABC people "look into it" NOTHING happens...its a judgement call, an opinion of what they saw...
and what do they end up doing? ban the judge because he saw differently than everyone else? nope... they dont do ****...

 

If Bradley paid his sanctioning fees to the WBO - and I know he did - then theres nothing those idiots can do other than order an immediate rematch - which I'm sure is fine with Bradley. The WBO has no power or authority whatsoever to overturn the result.

Bradley SD12

*******s had better get used to the idea...

 

Nor should they unless they can PROVE misconduct. I doubt they can.

 

exactly. this dummies on here need to look up what the word "judge" really means
its no different than a MLB game being "overturned" because an umpire made a bad call on a tag or balls and strikes...

ps
the pirate hat is pimp haha

 

Bradley would want a rematch.

 

Are they going to review Marquez 3 as well? No special treatment should be given. Manny should have lost the Marquez fight as he only won 3 rounds at best in that fight.

 

In extreme cases overturning a judges decison makes sense, and would improve the crediability of the sport. I am not referring to close fights. Lara-Williams, Abril-Rios, Mataisse-Alexander, Pacquiao-Bradley, and a couple of others come to mind of the most recent disasters.

 

I take Bradley won the fight in your world.. good for you

 

Would it be a worrying precedent to overturn a bad decision? Are you being serious?
In fact id would help the sport to implement a 2 judging system based on video analysis. All bad decisions could be overturned.

 

did the Lara-Willimas decision get overturned??????hell no the judges got suspended and nothing happned

 

there have been alot of worst decisions in this past year alone

 

Maybe, but this one was ****ing awful. I had it like 9-3 Pac.