let me get this straight once and for all when ever there was unification between the wbo and another titlist what titlist won just answer me that the wbo has got a 100 percent record with all the belts just check the records its who hold the titles look at the wbo champions and who held that belt case closed, please prove me wrong i will gracefully except defeat but the wbo titlist seem to be like hungry wolves smashing all other titlist just check if im talkin crap
I have learned that the wbo is more of a spring board to bigger and better titles ..The only thing it lacks is the respect and crediilty that the major 3 get ..
it's true but interesting how belts like the ibo is now a major belt....out of nowhere. i have no problems with wbo they are very respectable in my book not creditable but never have they stripped titles for no reason or stripped titles becuase another champ wants it or wants to have...super championatsch with a regular champion and interim champion
Considering who has held the belts I don't understand how the IBO can even come close to getting as much respect as the WBO ..
wbo is the best run organization.....by default hamed had the wbo and won all the other belts, dm had the wbo and won the wba and ibf, Corrales had the WBO and won the WBC/undisputed title.
I've often felt though that the WBO title is like a handout for anyone good Frank Warren can find. His fighters seem to get shots at that and no other (or not even at that for his recent heavyweight merry-go-round...
