WBSS: Krzysztof Głowacki vs. Maksim Vlasov & Mairis Briedis vs. Noel Mikaelian RBR.

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by CST80, Nov 10, 2018.


  1. CST80

    CST80 De Omnibus Dubitandum Staff Member

    239,490
    231,213
    Nov 23, 2013
    You can quote me jackass, when responding to something I said to you. I told you not to quote me that particular day, because I didn't feel like your horse****.

    In what realm was Glowacki the underdog? A few betting sites? To the vast majority, Glowcki was the odds on favorite, so cut that bull****.

    Take your holier than thou act and shove it up your ass.
     
  2. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    80,082
    20,667
    Sep 15, 2009
    I didn't make him the underdog. It wasn't me who dictated the odds. I expected him to win and I picked him to win. For some reason the bookies disagreed and must have known something I didn't.

    I'm not claiming to be a holy poster. I'm just pointing out that as a fellow member of a boxing forum, we share a common interest, so I'd have no reason to dislike anyone on here.
     
  3. CST80

    CST80 De Omnibus Dubitandum Staff Member

    239,490
    231,213
    Nov 23, 2013
    That's great to know, now why don't you try pointing out how great of a scorer I am, like you do to Pinoy, and then throw shade at him for his scores you disagree with?

    See, this post reveals your true nature, you exposed yourself badly. You only praise Pinoy when he agrees with you, and never throw shade at him when you don't. Yet, you always criticize me when you disagree, and never praise me when you do. That's kind of omission bias, kind of like what the media does with Trump all of the time.

    Try rectifying that, then maybe I'll believe what you say a little more often.

    And that's also great that you like Trump. But I disagree with most Trump voters 50% of the time as well. But good to know regardless.
     
  4. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    80,082
    20,667
    Sep 15, 2009
    There's a few issues there. Firstly it's not about disagreeing with scores, it's more about not disagreeing with scores. For example a card edging the fight to Vlasov isn't something I disagree, neither is a wider card to Glowacki. There's a wide range of scores for any given boxing fight and I'm ok with that because it's a subjective sport. The second issue is that PP is a nice poster and doesn't insult me ever so doesn't require any shade from me. The third thing is I never threw shade any way, I merely said I felt the cards were fair.

    I didn't vote Trump so no reason to disagree with me there lol.
     
  5. CST80

    CST80 De Omnibus Dubitandum Staff Member

    239,490
    231,213
    Nov 23, 2013
    Yet you manage to praise the official judgs with it wide to Glowacki and omit any praise of people who had it close for Vlasov, which you also just said was an acceptable score. So why if that's the case, didn't you say, hey guys on the RBR, excellent scores across the board, I can see all sides of the argument here?

    PP has a passive aggressive streak too, maybe that's why youre so find of him.:deal:
     
  6. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    80,082
    20,667
    Sep 15, 2009
    See when people disagree with the judges they start spouting off bs about robberies etc. When I see a few of those posts in a thread and I feel a robbery is too strong of a phrase, I let it be known that actually I think the cards were fair.

    PP certainly doesn't hurl huuse at me when I have a differing view point.