Weigh-in: Vyacheslav Glazkov, 220 vs. Malik Scott, 225

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Champion, Feb 23, 2013.


  1. Champion

    Champion Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,083
    14
    Nov 28, 2011
    This content is protected
     
  2. RonnieHornschuh

    RonnieHornschuh ESB indie police Full Member

    6,024
    16
    Mar 21, 2007
    Glazkov would be a hell of a cruiserweight.
     
  3. Espin88

    Espin88 Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,784
    9
    Sep 28, 2012
    No surprises, although i expected Scott to have a bit more of a height advantage, Glazkov wins this.
     
  4. Vysotsky

    Vysotsky Boxing Junkie banned

    12,797
    11
    Oct 14, 2009
    6'3 vs 6'4 and that looks about right in the pic. What were you expecting?
     
  5. Espin88

    Espin88 Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,784
    9
    Sep 28, 2012
    I always thought Malik was 6,5.
     
  6. chitownfightfan

    chitownfightfan Loyal Member Full Member

    34,569
    1,279
    May 31, 2010
    Mike Tyson wouldve been as well.....kindof glad he didnt lose those extra 15lbs to campaign against smaller guys.

    As for Glaskov, he walks around about 230, and has a natural athletic build. Why drain himself for short money?

    If he wins tonight, he'll be getting an eliminator and either Scott or Glaskov stands a much better chance of beating Pulev than Cunningham or Adamek did.:think
     
  7. RonnieHornschuh

    RonnieHornschuh ESB indie police Full Member

    6,024
    16
    Mar 21, 2007
    Tyson was much leaner and CW limit was 190 back then. Glazkov has a rather unimpressive physique for today's HW.

    This content is protected
     
  8. Espin88

    Espin88 Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,784
    9
    Sep 28, 2012
    I know, unlike Thompson & Charr.
     
  9. Cael

    Cael Claudia Cardinale Full Member

    3,379
    8
    Sep 17, 2010
    Malik is taking that fool to school
    :deal
     
  10. Vysotsky

    Vysotsky Boxing Junkie banned

    12,797
    11
    Oct 14, 2009
    I don't know about that, shockingly neither of them are rated in the top 15 by and org which is baffling when looking at some of the nobodies that are. I suspect the winner will make the RING top 10 and probably appear within the top 10 of a couple orgs. Doubt they'll get an eliminator off this in spite of the fact that they're more deserving than some guys like Arreola, Stiverne or Mitchell for example.
     
  11. chitownfightfan

    chitownfightfan Loyal Member Full Member

    34,569
    1,279
    May 31, 2010
    I thought it was certain that the IBF was making this a semifinal eliminator in lieu of Adamek backing out of the eliminator???????:think
     
  12. HamburgBuam

    HamburgBuam Boxing Addict Full Member

    7,148
    1,376
    Nov 13, 2010
    Scott should win this fight, because he has the much better defence.
     
  13. Vysotsky

    Vysotsky Boxing Junkie banned

    12,797
    11
    Oct 14, 2009
    I didnt read that. Last rumors i remember were of Fury/USS winner or Jennings. Last time Chambers dropped out they just made Thompson mandatory ffs. Pulev has done twice as much as most to earn the #1 rating and being forced to wait around for another fight is a poor solution imo.

    In a ideal situation id like to see the Scott/Glazkov winner fight in the WBO eliminator against Helenius since there still hasnt been any reports about a possible opponent, it better not be some bum as Helenius still has to prove himself post injury and the Williams fight sure as **** didnt do that.
     
  14. Greco

    Greco Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,680
    26
    Apr 26, 2008
    Imagine that. Two heavyweight contenders fighting, and both showed up in shape.
     
  15. irishny

    irishny Obsessed with Boxing banned

    15,119
    9
    May 8, 2009
    Its like Bizarro world