Okay then. You're talking about speed as if that automatically qualifies you for a schooling type win over Roberto Duran. You ever heard of Ken Buchanan? Not ultra fast but twice the moving boxer whilst putting bunches of shots together that Pacquiao is. It's not speed my friend that os the problem for Duran, he was beaten by guys who executed a perfect gameplan. He also beat guys who executed perfect gameplans. Your reasoning is ridiculous, picking out incidents and ignoring others. That's why i feel an idiot replying to you, but what can i say, i'm easily wound up. Wilfred Benitez beat Duran at what would become one of the low points of his volatile career, and at 154 pounds when he had visibly declined. Don't deny this, you look at the man in his prime and then don't speak on that. Where do Hearns, and Leonard compare to Pacquiao and Mayweather on a STYLISTIC level Ricky ******o? Notice that i'm not saying Pacquiao and Mayweather are not as good or not as fast as Hearns and Leonard, i'm talking about how they fight. Now stop pissing me off with these annoying debating techniques, it's shambolic.
Yeah haha, the post i replied to there was from page 4. I replied to it then saw everyone not even taking him serious on pages 5 and 6, so i feel a bit silly now! We should be able to delete deliberate (spellcheck?) trolling though, it ruins threads.
Hey there's nothing wrong w/ Duranology and your sad ending I read about 15 years ago in the book "Sleepers". good post though!:goodThe forum needs more of this than all the total seriousness most get caught up in.
I wouldn't mind you having several accounts, each with its own individual picture of W.R. Otherwise, it's a chronic waste.