Were does MAB Rank in the top 100 ATGS?

they should not be 5 places apart

 

And ? What the hell does that have to do with their head to head comparisons ??

Is Taylor going to be ranked higher over Pavlik because he beat Hopkins and Pavlik didn't ? Rember who won the best out of 3 between MAB and EM it was MAB !

 

Is someone saying that they should be 5 places apart? I think no one. Its a given fact that they should be next to each other or close to each other in the atg rankings.

 

Lol your not getting my point. The thread titles says where does mab rank in the all time atg and then you came in and saying that mab is ahead of morales. Atg rankings has a lot of factors and that includes resume. Yes mab is ahead sligthly in the head to head mtch up agaisnt morales but morales beat the boxers whom mab failed to beat and that is a plus factor that is why i think morales should be ahead of mab two to three places.
Buster douglas beat tyson and head to head douglas has the advantage due to the fact that he beat tyson but reality check tyson is way ahead in the atg rankings. lol douglas is not even in the 1000th place. Did you see the logic there?

 

If you follow Ring magazine, around 43

 

any new annual special by the ring magazine?

 

Pac is top 40. The resmue is too good not to be.

 

Should be at 42

 

I'm gonna reserve judgement on Pac until he's forced to fight young, prime fighters.

 

So who do you think he should fight? Kindly name some boxers pls who is better and a harder fight for pac around 140 lbs. down than fighting ricky hatton?

 

Yes maybe your right that it should be fair to say that they should be rate even but look mab cannot beat boxers whom morales beat. And i do believe that morales will also whoop even a prime hamed. Overall resume and accomplishment morales is significantly ahead because of the win against fighters who koed mab. Head to head mab is slightly ahead due to the fact that all of thier fights are close and by the way i have morales winning the second fight its ok if you will disagree on that but those fights are too damn close it could go either way.

 

Either just in it or just outside it depending on your criteria.

 

No I replied to someone who said MAB should be 2 spots lower than Morales I didn't just start this all of a sudden ..And come on brotha Buster Douglas ??

Outside of Tyson what else has he done ..Don't insult me with such a weak arguement ! And regardless if Morales beat 2 opponenets that Marco couldn't still doesn't get him a higher ranking when head to head MAB beat him 2 out of 3 times ..And he beat him after he beat Jr Jones and not too long before he beat Manny !


I bet you think Bernard Hopkins should be ranked higher than Roy Jones because he beat Glen Johnson ! Sorry my friend your logic is very flawed !!