Were Toney's best performances at mw better than B-Hop's at mw or Calzaghe's at smw?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by horst, Jan 29, 2011.


Page 3 of 5
  1. horst

    horst Guest

    Yeah, Nunn was p4p number THREE there, but not even in The Ring top 10. ****ing woeful.

    :patsch
     
    horst, Jan 29, 2011
    horst, Jan 29, 2011
    #31
  2. horst

    horst Guest

    :yikes Are you serious, or are you the most ******ed individual EVER to type posts onto this forum??????


    WHERE did I say anything of the sort??????
     
    horst, Jan 29, 2011
    horst, Jan 29, 2011
    #32
  3. iceferg

    iceferg Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,348
    2,312
    Apr 25, 2008
    I remember reading a few of your threads a couple of years ago they were all slagging of JC. I never knew as an earlier poster stated that you began hating him because of his victory over B-hop, but you will slag B-Hop off to degrade Calzaghe. Calzaghe is my favourite fighter out of this bunch but I honestly think the only fighter who proved he was better than these 3 was Jones. Toney did not do anything that impressive at Super Middle though, so really this thread should not even include Calzaghe. Just had a look at boxrec and it says the Nunn fight was at super middle. Looking at Toney's super middle wins there is nothing too impressive there. There are no wins on Nunn' record that are any better than Kessler's either really.
     
    iceferg, Jan 29, 2011
    iceferg, Jan 29, 2011
    #33
  4. iceferg

    iceferg Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,348
    2,312
    Apr 25, 2008
    You said at the start of this thread that Toney faced better and tougher competition than Hopkins and Calzaghe did at their weights but did not stay at those weights as long.
     
    iceferg, Jan 29, 2011
    iceferg, Jan 29, 2011
    #34
  5. iceferg

    iceferg Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,348
    2,312
    Apr 25, 2008
    If this really is just comparing middle weight resumes, then why the **** do you have to bring Calzaghe into it. Surely you can only compare wins at his own weight lmao.
     
    iceferg, Jan 29, 2011
    iceferg, Jan 29, 2011
    #35
  6. iceferg

    iceferg Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,348
    2,312
    Apr 25, 2008
    I'm not even taking this thread seriously anymore since I don't buy into all of that h2h ****. Toney has some quality wins and is neck and neck with Calzaghe and B-Hop p4p for moving up so many weights but this whole thing is bull really. Why the thread has to involve Calzaghe is a joke.
     
    iceferg, Jan 29, 2011
    iceferg, Jan 29, 2011
    #36
  7. horst

    horst Guest

    Why would I do that though, you ****ing imbecile? :nut

    If I wanted to degrade Calzaghe, I would just degrade him wouldn't I?



    So you are arguing the point with me, and yet you do not even know if the Nunn fight was middle or supermiddle?

    :yikes

    Honestly, this is the most pathetic performance ever seen from any poster on here.
     
    horst, Jan 29, 2011
    horst, Jan 29, 2011
    #37
  8. horst

    horst Guest

    Can you read? :nut

    The thread-title is so, so simple to understand.


    "Were Toney's best performances at mw better than B-Hop's at mw or Calzaghe's at smw?"


    What the **** is it you still, unbelievably, do not understand here???
     
    horst, Jan 29, 2011
    horst, Jan 29, 2011
    #38
  9. horst

    horst Guest

    Same advice as your last post: Read the ****ing thread-title. :deal

    It is NEVER this difficult a concept to grasp. Seriously.
     
    horst, Jan 29, 2011
    horst, Jan 29, 2011
    #39
  10. iceferg

    iceferg Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,348
    2,312
    Apr 25, 2008
    Clearly a spelling mistake because I am using my phone.
     
    iceferg, Jan 29, 2011
    iceferg, Jan 29, 2011
    #40
  11. iceferg

    iceferg Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,348
    2,312
    Apr 25, 2008
    Stumbled up on the small print here. I never actually thought anyone would be so pathetic as to bring Calzaghe into it when it is h2h and judging which fighters win is better is objective enough already. Why not bring lightweights in as well if that's the case or Heavyweights.
    Last comment on this thread. I am happy for you to have your opions on JC, I will certainly not bother arguin with you about him no more because you clearly look for any loop hole you can to have a dig at him.
     
    iceferg, Jan 29, 2011
    iceferg, Jan 29, 2011
    #41
  12. horst

    horst Guest

    Excellent news!!

    Thanks so much for your invaluable, relevant and insightful contributions in your time on here, and adios!

    :hi:
     
    horst, Jan 29, 2011
    horst, Jan 29, 2011
    #42
  13. horst

    horst Guest

    :patsch

    Yes, it is the most evil thing imaginable to consider how a fighter in a short title reign produced great performances compared to those produced by two much longer-term champions. What a thoroughly despicable idea for a thread.

    I was going to make one comparing the lightweight reign of Duran and the shorter welterweight reign of Ray Leonard, but I will definitely scrap that idea now, now I see how ****ing disgusting and shameful it is to compare fighters of different weights.

    :dead:dead:dead
     
    horst, Jan 29, 2011
    horst, Jan 29, 2011
    #43
  14. 46and0

    46and0 It's irrefutable. Full Member

    7,011
    139
    Dec 6, 2008
    We interrupt this thread to bring you this important news::deal

    This content is protected
     
    46and0, Jan 29, 2011
    46and0, Jan 29, 2011
    #44
  15. horst

    horst Guest

    :lol: You must have so, so much time on your hands.
     
    horst, Jan 29, 2011
    horst, Jan 29, 2011
    #45
Page 3 of 5