No problem at all. Just answer the simple question that I asked of you first. I asked my question first, which you completely ignored. So as soon as you’ve answered, I’ll gladly answer. The funny thing about you, is that you question me on my points about fighters struggling with certain styles, yet at the same time, you say things like: “Floyd would have beaten Hagler” So why exactly are you arguing with me? If every bigger guy had the advantage, then kindly explain to me why you believe that a 5’8 defensive fighter would have beaten an ATG MW, who’d have had advantages in reach, weight, height, strength and power over him?
Don’t worry about answering my question. I don’t really need you to answer. As it happens, I’m just reading an old thread what you have contributed to. A thread where you have said that Mike Tyson would have destroyed Deontay Wilder. Ha! It’s hilarious. Especially as Mike was even slightly smaller than Joe. So by your own admission: A 6’7 guy wouldn’t have been able to have beaten a guy of 5’10. I’ll save you the embarrassment of posting it. (or will I?) Enjoy your weekend.