What are some things that Dana White/the UFC has done that you approve of?

Discussion in 'MMA Forum' started by Haggis McJackass, Jul 6, 2011.


  1. tri-pod

    tri-pod Guest


    I understand where it originated from, that's why I said the pioneers of modern MMA, e.g. Chuck, Tito, Hughes, Couture.

    That was just a little bit of backlash left over from arguing with boxing fans around the Couture/Tony fight and HENDO about how it isn't street fighting anymore, and has evolved into it's own sport. :D

    :hop
     
  2. timmyjames

    timmyjames PTurd curb stomper Full Member

    12,816
    1
    Nov 14, 2009
    i just think it's the evolution of the sport....you had the early years where guys came in under one discipline and sometimes it worked, but usually they ran into serious problems (ex: boxer vs. bjj), so people realized they need to cross train....then it got a little homogenized, because everyone was basically training the same exact things (ufc rules watered it down a little too), and now, you have guys breaking free from that (machida, jones, cruz) while having a nice solid well-rounded base, they get to add their own flair into things
     
  3. Koa

    Koa Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,380
    3
    Sep 24, 2004
    Absolutely. But when you take something that should be part of everyone's base, like Wrestling and you value/reward aspects of wrestling that aren't conducive to ending a fight, then that is where there is stagnation. We have wrestlers who focus more on control than actual gnp or submission fighting, and from here the sport stagnates.

    Example is a prime Matt Hughes. He had a great mix of wrestling and submission game in his prime, he looked to end every fight he got into and at the same time he didn't appear to try to force anything. Watching how he utilized his medley of skills, which was probably a smaller medley than many current fighters was more the type of thing I enjoyed watching. Watching guys control, and use the control to go for subs or gnp is great. But going for control, for the sake of control and winning a decision isn't in the spirit of the sport. I don't think it was ever intended, rather its a side effect of rules which are supposed to make the fight game more humane..
     
  4. Haggis McJackass

    Haggis McJackass Semi-neutralist Overseer Full Member

    5,126
    1
    Jul 20, 2004
    Win tonight. Try to look spectacular next time out. :good

    That **** that you are talking about is fine if you're brawling in amateur shows. When this is your living and you are fighting to pay your rent and put food on your table, you are smarter if you fight to a) get the win, b) not get badly injured while getting the win, and then if possible, c) look exciting.

    Some guy's styles are more exciting than others. But I tell you what, this is a sport, and more than that, it is how these guys make their living. If you can control a guy for 15 minutes, not take any real punishment, not expose yourself to needless risk and walk away with the win bonus, why would you elect to get into a wild 50/50 brawl instead?

    What you are after seems to basically either be carpark brawls, or organized fights to the death. But this is a SPORT. In a sport, professional athletes use the letter of the law, not the spirit. It's unreasonable to ask them to do anything else. Wandy had a great crowd-pleasing style, but he took a LOT of needless punishment in his career. If you had a son looking for a career in MMA, would you rather he had a streetfighter's mentality like Wandy, or a professional athlete's mentality like GSP?

    :hat
     
  5. achillesthegreat

    achillesthegreat FORTUNE FAVOURS THE BRAVE Full Member

    37,070
    29
    Jul 21, 2004
    Some people will always hate but generally, and I mean 90% of the time, the fans don't know what they have got in the UFC. Generally we get stacked cards of competative match ups of the best mixed martial artists in the world. Incredible production, loads of marketing and an accessible organisation from the fighters up to the president. I don't see the head of the FA giving such open interviews on a weekly basis.
     
  6. timmyjames

    timmyjames PTurd curb stomper Full Member

    12,816
    1
    Nov 14, 2009

    it's the watered down rules....in pride, and now dream...if a fight goes to the cards, one of the key elements to the scoring is which fighter is trying to end the fight, whether by KO or sub...that doesn't exist in the UFC, so fighters can get away with lay and pray....but like you said, not their fault...they are maximizing their risk/reward under the scoring system in which they are fighting
     
  7. Haggis McJackass

    Haggis McJackass Semi-neutralist Overseer Full Member

    5,126
    1
    Jul 20, 2004
    But that's hardly ideal either.

    Say we are fighting, and I use my superior wrestling to control you for 15 minutes, nullifying all your offense so that you can't do anything. You are trying your best to submit me, but every time you try something I grab you and regain control easily. I don't try to take risks to finish you. Instead I am happy to demonstrate that, over three rounds, you are powerless to control where the fight happens, powerless to control your body position, completely unable to take me out of my fight plan. In short, I demonstrate that you utterly fail to impose your will on me.

    And now, because I was happy to control you and display my superior skills and didn't really try to submit you, you are favoured in the scoring because you "tried" to submit me? Even though you had no control of the fight at any stage? I'd rather the guy who controls the fight gets the win over the guy who tried to be exciting and couldn't get the job done.

    If there's going to be a simple rule, it should be "Which one was mostly fighting on his own terms, and which one was mostly fighting in the areas and at the pace that his opponent wanted?"

    :hat
     
  8. timmyjames

    timmyjames PTurd curb stomper Full Member

    12,816
    1
    Nov 14, 2009
    again, this comes down to rules.....no knees on the ground...no holding the cage for TDD, no soccer kicks stomps (for people to worry about should they miss that low single), no small joint manipulation....lay and pray only works because of the rule set, and scoring system
     
  9. Haggis McJackass

    Haggis McJackass Semi-neutralist Overseer Full Member

    5,126
    1
    Jul 20, 2004
    Indeed. I think that much of it could be fixed by a simple "if you have mount and 20 seconds go by without you actively trying to improve your position, the ref stands you both up" rule. That and perhaps the yellow/red card system for excessive stalling etc, though that opens up a whole can of worms.

    :hat
     
  10. timmyjames

    timmyjames PTurd curb stomper Full Member

    12,816
    1
    Nov 14, 2009
    yeah, the refs need to be a little faster on the restart...but i can see that getting messy too....guys just immediately closing their guard and hanging on for dear life looking at the clock...17, 16, 15....

    but i think we all agree...the scoring blows at this point
     
  11. Koa

    Koa Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,380
    3
    Sep 24, 2004
    Actually with GSP I appreciate his style. He actually attempts submissions. He wasn't able to finish Hardy, but he did put himself in positions where he went for the submission and as a result lost top control. What I like about Georges is he is willing to take controlled risks. With Kos the fight should have been stopped.. So I don't really mind his fights.

    Wanderlei is a fighters fighter. Eventually guys that bang go out on their shields, and that is just part of their style.
     
  12. Haggis McJackass

    Haggis McJackass Semi-neutralist Overseer Full Member

    5,126
    1
    Jul 20, 2004
    I like GSP too. But he'll take a win in a dull fight over a loss in an exciting brawl every time.

    And it's when you start demanding that EVERY fighter fights balls out like Wandy that the human cockfighting angle really comes into the discussion.

    :hat
     
  13. Koa

    Koa Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,380
    3
    Sep 24, 2004
    That's not what I want either. I want fighters to try to finish fights, finishing a fight, attempting to finish a fight can be tactically done. GSP has shown it... There are strikers out there who do it as well, Anderson Silva has a careful approach but he always puts himself in a situation where he gets the opportunities to finish fights.

    As professional fighters, that is what I come to expect from them. If you are up against a tough opponent and the matchup is bad, like say Rampage vs. Rashad? What should Rashad have done you may ask?

    I say he should have worked on his submission game and gnp, Rampage isn't known to be the sort of guy to throw a triangle on someone from his back, he also isn't someone known to protect his legs in the standup.. All he did was stall that fight. If he knew he wanted nothing to do with Rampage's standup and wanted to avoid that, then good for him, take it to the ground. But when your on the ground, I want him to work his gnp, use the gnp to open up submission attempts. Not just press his opponent against the cage while holding onto a single leg for 2-3 minutes at a time. Or getting mount and never throwing any meaningful punches, and never attempting ANY subs.

    What has ended up happening is this.. A, "fighter" can sit in his opponents guard all night, throw a half hearted hammer fist every couple minutes, while his opponent on his back is doing everything he can to slap on a triangle choke.. The guy chilling out in his opponents guard, defending against subs gets credit for dominant position, where the guy trying to end the fight gets penalized, and at the end of the day would be better rewarded by simply controlling his opponents head from the bottom, grabbing the back of his opponents head and stalling himself to force the ref to stand them back up.. What sort of **** is that? The guy trying to end the fight gets penalized, when a huge aspect of MMA is, and should be countering from the guard.

    Is it a good thing to punish a guy like Shinya Aoki for pulling guard, where he could slap on any number of submissions from that position? It just seems like a backwards thing to do given how important that aspect of the game is, and how incredibly skilled some guys are. To me it's like telling everyone they have to have vanilla ice cream even though there are so many more flavors readily available.

    If you haven't seen this guy, check him out.

    [ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KIuYaoMbhX4&feature=related[/ame]

    This sort of fight game was not honed and refined as a result of UFC rules. If we want to see more of this sort of fighting, and promote and develop this sort of fighting further, then we should reconsider the way top control, and cage control is viewed/ scored. We could promote, develop and help the submission game evolve by changing up the rules.
     
  14. wakzer

    wakzer Member Full Member

    128
    0
    May 15, 2011
    Bad decisions, destroyed PRIDE, lay`n pray,.... :good
     
  15. Haggis McJackass

    Haggis McJackass Semi-neutralist Overseer Full Member

    5,126
    1
    Jul 20, 2004
    How do you mean? What were some of the bad decisions, and I thought PRIDE didn't suffer from boring lay and pray fights. :huh

    :hat