What are the implications of Jennings defeating Wladimir?

Well for one, Jennings would become extremely wealthy when he fights the rematch with Wlad for millions. Boxing seems more popular now in Europe and elsewhere than in the U.S. The latest belt winning victory by Wilder seems to have excited almost no one. Back in the day an American winning a version of the heavyweight title would be covered more by the mainstream press. Now, just a collective yawn. Most of the raw talent seems to be coming from Eastern Europe and countries south of the Rio Grande. That is boxing's future.

 

since this is a voluntary fight I am sure Klitschko has a rematch clause in the event of a loss. If not it could set up an all American Unification fight with Wilder.

 

Everyone would say Wlad was dehydrated.

 

Vitali would come out of retirement to beat up the bad man who beat up his little brother, as oft times before.

 

Why?

Jennings is a **** fight and I don't give a **** what ball swingers like you have to say on the matter

At least the Briggs fight would bring a lot of pre fight excitement and would no doubt end in a KO

 

:deal

 

It would be the biggest upset in boxing history.

 

Wlad most likely has a rematch clause with Jennings. This is a voluntary defense. So Wlad would rematch Jennings in case he lost.

 

Klitschko is a 16:1 favorite over Jennings....................but, at least Jennings is a ranked fighter and will fight Vlad. Wilder refused to fight Vlad and Vlad wants to fight Wilder ASAP for Vitali's title. Wilder said he would fight Fury next and then Vlad, but he appears to have misinformed the fans. Fury refused to fight his mandatory because his mandatory is Vlad. As far as hard punchers, Wach is 6 feet 8, 250 lbs., hits hard, has a rock chin and tested positive for steroids after the fight with Vlad, and Vlad still beat him from one side of the to the other, won every round. Wach would knock Wilder out and Wilder could not hurt Wach..................

 

So that means you have doubts klitschko vs Jennings will have a KO ending, meaning you think Jennings will go the distance. Yet you think that's a **** fight and shot Briggs being KO'd is a better fight? :huh

 

Did he not just blow out his #1 Contender in Pulev?

Is it not widely agreed upon that all the other top ranked HW's have no chance against him?

A loss against Jennings would matter and would be extremely damaging.

 

Since when his Wlad known for re-matching his losses?.

He never did and don't say Brewster who was retired and coming off a career ending loss.

 

it would be great for boxing....it would bring excitement back to the sport because the matchup possibilities would be very interesting and potentially very exciting.

it would also invalidate the entire klitchko era as nothing more than an ugly stain on the history of boxing.

 

Its not going to happen, pointless discussion.