I'm disappointed that you can't even answer a simple question. Are you back to arguing that $40 million to Pacquiao somehow = 100/0 purse split in favor of Floyd, dip****? Yes, or no? :think
Dude, the 100/0 is referring to percentage based payment discussion. Only you is arguing other than that. Even PBF himself knows that discussion is referring to percentage based payment. So YES- even PBF would argue so.
No, douche, $40 million guaranteed =/= 0%. It doesn't matter who "would argue" what. You made an inaccurate statement. Instead of acknowledging that fact or just simply moving on, you're still trying to argue that your inaccurate statement was somehow accurate, which is just ****ing pathetic. :verysad
Again you miss the point and resorts to semantics and emoticons. 1 step forward 2 steps back. Keep digging.
Again with the "semantics" and whining about emoticons. :| Keep whining, *****. I find it funny. :|:|:|:yep
Holy ****, you actually believe a website that has celebritynetworth.com in it? Simple maths would simply say it is impossible for Gayfraud queerweather do have that amount. This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected