What Are The Worst Trilogys,or String Of Fights....

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by cuco64, Nov 1, 2008.


  1. cuco64

    cuco64 Member Full Member

    494
    2
    Oct 11, 2008
    U have ever saw? I have to said the ruiz-holyfield fights,all three of them were boredom.Also, Tarver/Johnson 1 and 2 were pretty bad too, and no way I wanted to see a third bout.
     
    cuco64, Nov 1, 2008
    cuco64, Nov 1, 2008
    #1
  2. Thread Stealer

    Thread Stealer Loyal Member Full Member

    42,078
    3,670
    Jun 30, 2005
    Ruiz-Holyfield wasn't as bad as people often say it was. The first fight was actually pretty decent, and the 2nd fight at least had a strong finish. The rubber match was utter dog ****.

    The Hopkins-Allen trilogy was worse. The first ended early in a no-contest, the 2nd was a pretty good ass kicking, and the 3rd was a cure for insomnia.
     
    Thread Stealer, Nov 1, 2008
    Thread Stealer, Nov 1, 2008
    #2
  3. imp4pdabest

    imp4pdabest Guest

    And they're talking about a Mora/Forrest 3!!!!!!!!! LMAO
     
    imp4pdabest, Nov 1, 2008
    imp4pdabest, Nov 1, 2008
    #3
  4. sugarngold

    sugarngold RIDDUM Full Member

    18,550
    5
    Jun 10, 2007
    Ruiz and Holyfield has to rank near the top. If Hopkins and Taylor had fought one more time - it could be in there as well.
     
    sugarngold, Nov 1, 2008
    sugarngold, Nov 1, 2008
    #4
  5. Thread Stealer

    Thread Stealer Loyal Member Full Member

    42,078
    3,670
    Jun 30, 2005
    Tarver-Johnson 1 was bad??

    That was a good, close fight. The rematch was alright.
     
    Thread Stealer, Nov 1, 2008
    Thread Stealer, Nov 1, 2008
    #5
  6. Coogee2034

    Coogee2034 Member Full Member

    340
    0
    Jun 13, 2008
    mundine-soliman...second fight was good...first n third crap
     
    Coogee2034, Nov 1, 2008
    Coogee2034, Nov 1, 2008
    #6