What are you thoughts on the nws era?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by lufcrazy, Nov 30, 2011.


  1. Jear

    Jear Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,720
    12
    Jul 27, 2004
    Problem I have is the reporters who rendered the decisions often had hometown and or colour bias. Not all but many.
    I think they should stand on a fighters record as any bad official decision does but before placing too much credence in them maybe research if the paper had a habit of favouring the particular fighter
     
  2. Surf-Bat

    Surf-Bat Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,736
    97
    Jul 20, 2010
    There were usually many newspapers covering a fight, so if a reporter had a color or hometown bias it would have stood out like a sore thumb. Especially regarding color. I have found that the reporters of the no-decision era were pretty fair and consistent when reporting on fights involving black fighters. If a black fighter won, even by a hair, they usually didn't have much trouble saying so and giving due credit.
     
  3. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    81,432
    21,860
    Sep 15, 2009
    I completely agree with this but there are a couple of fights that have dramatically different writeups, some of benny leonard's come to mind.

    In general though when there's more than 3 paper's i'm very confident with going via majority decisions.