What are your controversial boxing opinions?

That's not an opinion. Did you miss a bit off the end? :?

 

I like watching fights in the last 20 years more then old greats fight.

 

Leonard was a great fighter but his carrer is hurt by inactivity, and the timing he gave rematches.

Hopkins beats Hagler 7 out of 10 times

Larry Holmes is a top 4 all time heavyweight

Shane Mosley is not a top 100 all time fighter

 

I apologies. I didn't realise I hate to put things in the most simplistic of forms.

I HATE the fact that they all have opinions that they can voice on Sky sports because their opinions are ****.

Better?

 

Cotto's still the best WW in the world, and even if you count Mayweather or Williams, this wouldn't change...

and this will be proven come Cotto-Margarito II........hopefully

 

Say it quietly, but I agree.

 

Call me crazy, but I actually score bodyshots. :yikes

I'm a rebel.

 

Well yeah. Because now we know whether you think they are good, or bad, or would like to **** them all, or think they are the top three fighters of all time...

 

Wow!

There's a novel idea. Let the olympic commission know. They're always welcoming of suggestions.

 

Hatton is overrated and Pac will/would deal with him inside 8 rounds. Hattons face will be a mess

Ali was never the greatest. Liston in his prime would have beaten him

Calzaghe is literally impossible to beat

 

damn right! :thumbsup

 

these are just my opinions:

hatton while a nice guy is overrated.

pep would get handily beat by the fab 4 of barrera, jmm, pac, morales

hearns would have beat srl 5/10 times

 

bowe would have ko'd lewis
tyson would have ko'd lewis
holyfield would always have beaten tyson



lewis is the best boxer out of all of the above!!

 

if Hearns had a chin he'd be a top 3 ATG

 

A very interesting point...