What are your controversial boxing opinions?

Fantastic read, I highly recommend it. :good

 

PBF is nearly as good as he claims to be.

 

I think Calzaghe would beat Chad Dawson very comfortably.

 

Wladimir Klitschko vs Ross Puritty and Wladimir Klitschko vs Lamon Brewster actually show that Wlad has a decent chin.

 

That Pac-Man thinks he will lose against hatton

 

hows it going?

 

So would Joe....

 

globalisation is good for the sport.

the american era is over.

 

Agreed, sadly:scaredas:

 

Frazier would of beaten Muhammad Ali in the Thrilla In Manilla if Futch would of let him continue.

The Chavez-Taylor stoppage was correct, it also should of been stopped earlier.

Joe Calzaghe wouldn't of beaten any of Hopkins, Jones, Toney et al in their primes.

I'm all for multiple belts & divisions.

I'm for a super-heavyweight division.

Pacquiao is doing everything possible to avoid Hatton.

I think Pacquiao lost both Marquez fights.

Hatton would knock Pacquiao out inside 10 rounds, and hurt him multiple times in the process.

A prime Lennox Lewis beats a prime Mike Tyson.

Haye would beat both Klitschko's.

Bernard Hopkins is the best fighter since Pernell Whitaker. I respect what Roy has done, but he's done it with sheer athleticism, he's more of an athlete than a fighter. Hopkins is sheer class, he's close to perfection as a fighter.

 

I see that more of a fact than a controversial opinion

Mine is Hopkins has a better resume than Jones and Mayweather.

 

im shedding a tear as we speak.

 

:fire:fire:fire

 

has'nt it always been globalized though? we've had multiple champions from asia (japan, the philippines, thailand) in addition to the latin americans in the lower weight classes. latin america has been a hot bed for boxing since the 60's. africans like dick tiger have also made their marks on the sport. europe has always had belt holders or contenders for years as well.