What are your controversial boxing opinions?

Malinaggis style was always going to be made for Hatton, he was fighting a pressure fighter who he didn't have the movement to avoid or the punch to deter. He was ****ed from the get go.

 

Hatton will KO Pac withon 6 rounds.

 

:deal

 

Jermaine Taylor had seven straight defeats.

Kell Brook is two years from beating Miguel Cotto.

Glenn Johnson has never been robbed, he's just not that good.

The current welterweight division is really nothing special at all.

 

Is this one contraversial?

 

tell me about this kid, I just checked him at boxrec and he has a decent record....tell me about style and his greatest qualities

 

Kell Brook is the future of British boxing. :deal

 

Without qualifying that as '87 Tyson, damn skippy it is! :bbb

 

I think Floyd would beat Pavlik.

 

Is that agreement with my opinion? Thanks BB.

If not (and I presume it isnt), think of this thread as therapy. Getting out those opinions which you usually have to back up with posts and posts of arguments in the other forums. Here, I can just state them succinctly and leave it at that.

More of mine include;

Hatton will beat Pac.
There is far too much emphasis on 'linear champion' (for this see Leon Spinks).
Regional titles should be re-introduced (in the UK, not sure whether anywhere else uses them).
I would pay at least another £10 on my TV licence if BBC snapped up some good domestic fights.
ITV Friday Fight Nights had the best theme music of a TV programme ever (bar the Sopranos)
Hamed is overrated and Sugar Ray Leonard is a complete tool.

You're entitled to your opinion and I'm entitled to mine. It just so happens that mine are 100% accurate :smoke

 

Theres an old guy , about 80 ,who goes in the pub i work in and always watches the boxing if its on. I asked him who is his fvorite fighter and he said Dick Tiger

 

:rofl

 

:hey

 

In no normal arena of discussion would this be considered controversial; but then, this is ESB we're talking about.